South Australia Lower House passes Surrogacy Bill

South Australia Lower House passes Surrogacy Bill

On Wednesday night, South Australia’s Lower House passed the Surrogacy Bill 2019. The Bill now goes to the Upper House, where it is likely to be debated next week.

The Bill, which was the subject of a conscience vote, passed with only 5 MP’s voting against- but with a change which requires any intended parent undergoing surrogacy in South Australia to pass a police check. I have previously blogged that I thought that such a change was not needed.

The point of the checks was to avoid there being another Baby Gammy case. The proposed change occurred at the same time as Victoria was looking at dropping the criminal checks altogether.

The Bill if passed will bring a Queensland or NSW style Surrogacy Act into South Australia- with flexibility in expenses of the surrogate being able to be made, and for the first time allow single intended parents to be able to access surrogacy in South Australia. I am strongly in favour of the Bill being enacted.

Currently South Australia’s surrogacy laws are contained in the Family Relationships Act, an Act that also deals with parentage presumptions.

South Australians will for the first time not be forced to undergo IVF in South Australia, but can choose to do IVF anywhere. While this at first seems that the sky is the limit on where they want to go, in relaity it is more restricted. This is because there are formal requirements of the doctor that are needed to make the surrogacy agreement a lawful one. Therefore any choice of having a doctor outside South Australia has to be met by the warning that the doctor’s actions will ultimately be accepted by a judge of the Youth Court of South Australia. If they’re not, then the court will not make an order transferring parentage to the intended parents.

There have now been three inquiries recently about this topic in South Australia:

  • an inquiry by the South Australian Law Reform Institute- about how the law treats LGBTI people- including as to ART/surrogacy. The review recommended removing discrimination against LGBTI and single people with surrogacy. The former occurred, but not the latter. I made submissions to the inquiry.
  • a review by Professor Sonia Allen about ART.
  • a further inquiry by SALRI about surrogacy/ ART which recommended many changes. I made submissions to the inquiry, and was referred to many times in the inquiry report. 

Following the last inquiry, the Attorney-General Vickie Chapman circulated a draft Surrogacy Bill for comment and response. My made submissions about the draft Bill, including that IVF did not need to be restricted to SA in surrogacy cases. I am delighted that my submissions were listened to. 

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

When intended parents consider international surrogacy, the legal and ethical landscape can be treacherous. One government has taken a blunt but pragmatic approach: rather than issuing a blanket prohibition on overseas commercial surrogacy, it has published a short list of specific countries where surrogacy arrangements will almost certainly jeopardise a child’s legal status. That list… Read More »3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Representing yourself in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is increasingly common. Cost pressures, the perceived simplicity of some disputes and a desire to stay hands-on drive many people to act without a lawyer. That can work in certain circumstances, but there are important legal and practical limits to be aware of —… Read More »Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

My Surrogacy Reform Wish List for Australia

Australia’s surrogacy framework is fragmented, outdated and producing avoidable harm for intended parents, surrogates and, most importantly, children. A clearer, fairer and nationally consistent approach to surrogacy law reform would reduce cost, stress and legal uncertainty while better protecting human rights and minimising exploitation. Below is a practical wish list for reform that focuses on… Read More »My Surrogacy Reform Wish List for Australia

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board