Protection orders for pets?

Protection orders for pets?

Following the last post, I came across a post by Daniel Clement in New York, commenting on a New York Times article:

Now, there is a trend to issue orders of protection in favor of pets. The New York Times reported that in one case in Connecticut, a golden retriever was granted an order of protection against one half of a divorcing couple.

As the police tell it, Cassandra Reynolds pulled up in the driveway of her ex-husband’s home in South Windsor to pick up a few belongings.

A dispute ensued. Her ex-husband’s golden retriever approached her, so she kicked it, the police said. The dog yelped. Ms. Reynolds was arrested.

That was on Sept. 23. The next day, a Superior Court judge ordered Ms. Reynolds, 39, to stay away from her ex-husband and his new wife. The judge also ordered her to stay at least 100 yards away from Riley, the golden retriever — or face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000.

Not surprisingly, pets, like people, are victims of domestic violence. According to the Times, there is legislation pending in other states, including New York, to allow courts to issue orders of protection in favor of animals. While this may be a noble and even necessary measure, I wonder if there is better way to accomplish the same goal.

As one police officer pointed out, “In a dispute, people tend to fixate on things they know will harm the other person.” Let me preface, my next statement, by saying I am a dog lover and owner. That said, is the case of directing anger against the dog in the incident described in the Times article, much different from smashing the windshield of the spouses car? Aren’t both acts really just displaced anger designed to hurt or terrorize the spouse?

Wouldn’t a better solution be to read and write orders of protection issued in cases of domestic violence broadly to protect both the person and the property of the person? Isn’t the symbolic act of violence directed to the property or pets of a person a threat which should be included in any protective order?

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

A record number of Australian children born overseas through surrogacy – again

For the second year in a row, there has been a record-breaking number of Australian children born overseas through surrogacy. For the year ending 30 June 2025, 377 children were born overseas through surrogacy, according to data compiled by the Department of Home Affairs. This just pips the previous record, set in 2024, of 376… Read More »A record number of Australian children born overseas through surrogacy – again

Your Partner Just Passed Away – You Have HOURS to Act!

I’m Stephen Page of Page Provan, a family and fertility lawyer. If you are reading this because you or someone you love faces the unthinkable — the sudden death or imminent death of a partner and you want to preserve the possibility of future children — this article explains what the law allows, what has changed,… Read More »Your Partner Just Passed Away – You Have HOURS to Act!

Planning International Surrogacy? This ONE Legal Mistake Could Devastate Your Family’s Future!

I’m Stephen Page from Page Provan Family & Fertility Lawyers. After advising on over 2,000 surrogacy journeys since 1988 and being a parent through surrogacy myself, I want to share a crucial warning: before you book a flight or sign any overseas surrogacy paperwork, get the legal foundations right. What looks like a straightforward, friendly… Read More »Planning International Surrogacy? This ONE Legal Mistake Could Devastate Your Family’s Future!

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board