Government abolishes trust tax cloning concession

Government abolishes trust tax cloning concession

The Assistant Treasurer, Chris Bowen MP, announced on 31 October that the Government will remove the capital gains tax (CGT) trust cloning exception to CGT events E1 and E2.
Removing the trust cloning exception is consistent with the policy principle of taxing capital gains that arise where there is a change in ownership of an asset as typically occurs on the creation of a trust over a CGT asset (event E1) and on transferring a CGT asset to an existing trust (event E2).
The other current exception to CGT events E1 and E2, where the taxpayer is the sole beneficiary of the relevant trust that is not a unit trust and the taxpayer is absolutely entitled to the asset as against the trustee, will be retained.

A mere change of trustee of a single trust will continue not to trigger a CGT taxing point.
The amendments will resolve uncertainty surrounding the application of the exception, which has created significant compliance and administrative costs for taxpayers and the Tax Office.
The amendments will also remove the possibility of using the trust cloning exception to eliminate tax liabilities on accrued capital gains which will help ensure equity and the integrity of the tax system.

Legislation giving effect to this measure will be introduced as soon as practicable.
Initial consultation will be undertaken on the design of these amendments; details will be released shortly on the Treasury website.

An exposure draft of the legislation will be released for consultation on the Treasury website after consulting on the design of these amendments.
The amendments will apply to CGT events happening from 1 November 2008.

Source: Ministerial Media Release

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Parenting plans vs consent orders explained

When parents separate, one of the most important questions is how arrangements for children will be recorded. Will the agreement be kept flexible through a parenting plan, or formalised in legally binding consent orders? There is no single answer that suits every family. The right option depends on the level of trust between parents, the… Read More »Parenting plans vs consent orders explained

Sperm donor family limit in Queensland explained

Queensland’s new sperm donor family limit was intended to create clarity, consistency and better access to donor sperm. Instead, guidance issued to IVF clinics has produced a result that appears to halve donor access for many lesbian couples. The legislation provides for a 10-family limit. Yet where two women are in a couple and seek… Read More »Sperm donor family limit in Queensland explained

NSW fertility inquiry: surrogacy evidence under scrutiny

The New South Wales Legislative Council fertility inquiry is examining difficult and practical questions about access to assisted reproductive treatment. Distance matters. Cost matters. Regulation matters. For many people trying to create a family, these are not abstract policy concerns. They can determine whether treatment is available at all. Among the issues before the inquiry… Read More »NSW fertility inquiry: surrogacy evidence under scrutiny

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board