Government abolishes trust tax cloning concession

Government abolishes trust tax cloning concession

The Assistant Treasurer, Chris Bowen MP, announced on 31 October that the Government will remove the capital gains tax (CGT) trust cloning exception to CGT events E1 and E2.
Removing the trust cloning exception is consistent with the policy principle of taxing capital gains that arise where there is a change in ownership of an asset as typically occurs on the creation of a trust over a CGT asset (event E1) and on transferring a CGT asset to an existing trust (event E2).
The other current exception to CGT events E1 and E2, where the taxpayer is the sole beneficiary of the relevant trust that is not a unit trust and the taxpayer is absolutely entitled to the asset as against the trustee, will be retained.

A mere change of trustee of a single trust will continue not to trigger a CGT taxing point.
The amendments will resolve uncertainty surrounding the application of the exception, which has created significant compliance and administrative costs for taxpayers and the Tax Office.
The amendments will also remove the possibility of using the trust cloning exception to eliminate tax liabilities on accrued capital gains which will help ensure equity and the integrity of the tax system.

Legislation giving effect to this measure will be introduced as soon as practicable.
Initial consultation will be undertaken on the design of these amendments; details will be released shortly on the Treasury website.

An exposure draft of the legislation will be released for consultation on the Treasury website after consulting on the design of these amendments.
The amendments will apply to CGT events happening from 1 November 2008.

Source: Ministerial Media Release

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

When parents cannot agree about arrangements for their children, the central question for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is not what either parent wants. It is what arrangements are in the best interests of the child. This is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act 1975. It applies whenever a judge… Read More »How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Iran is not a mainstream pathway for Australians, and at present it carries obvious travel, legal and practical risks. Yet for a small group of Iranian-Australian families, it has been a pathway to parenthood that feels culturally familiar, has access to sophisticated IVF treatment, and can result in an Australian child returning home… Read More »Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Surrogacy in Nigeria is becoming a consideration for some Australian intended parents, particularly Australians with Nigerian heritage who are looking to build their family in their country of origin. Nigeria is a large, diverse and increasingly visible destination for international surrogacy. However, it is also a destination that requires exceptional care. The central issue is… Read More »Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board