Family Court- notice to legal practitioners Murphy J’s list

Family Court- notice to legal practitioners Murphy J’s list

Justice Murphy of the Brisbane registry of the Family Court has issued the following notice:

NOTICE TO LEGAL PRACTITIONERS
COMMUNICATING WITH JUDGES – MATTERS IN MURPHY J’S DOCKET
Now that the docket system is in place in respect of all matters, it is timely – particularly given that many litigants appear for themselves – to remind all parties and practitioners of a number of matters relevant to communications with me when I am allocated as the docket Judge for a matter.

I seek to encourage intelligent and common sense management of cases within my dockets. As a result, it is recognised that formal and procedural matters can be dealt with by informal processes with significant savings in court time and expense to the parties. For that reason, I frequently order that consent minutes, consent adjournments and the like can be the subject of joint e-mail communication with my associate.

However, it is vital that all parties and practitioners understand the basis upon which contact with me (via my associate) about substantive matters should – or should not – occur.
It is never appropriate for any party, or any legal practitioner, to attempt to contact me about a matter for which I am responsible.
It is not usually appropriate for any party, or any legal practitioner, to contact my associate about a matter for which I am responsible unless all parties are in agreement that this should occur and then only for good reason.

Those instances should be uncommon.

Should it become necessary to contact me (through my associate) about any substantive issue relating to a matter, I expect that:

The party and/or practitioner seeking to contact my associate will first contact each other party or practitioner involved in the case. Any necessary communication will thereafter be joint and in writing.

In the event that genuine urgency, or other good reason, is said to prevent a joint written
communication occurring, the person seeking to contact my associate should first seek, in writing, consent from each other party/practitioner to contact being made and provide full details of the reason for, and nature of, the intended communication.

In cases of genuine urgency or in the event that consent is not forthcoming within a reasonable period of time, contact with my associate should be made, in writing, and – contemporaneously – a copy of that communication forwarded to each other party / practitioner.

A party should not seek to have oral communication with my associate about any substantive issue save in appropriate, extraordinary circumstances.

In all cases, except in appropriate, extraordinary circumstances, all communications from my associate to parties and/or practitioners about a matter will occur in writing and be sent contemporaneously to all parties / practitioners.

Case managers and docket registrars will be reminded of these arrangements and, similarly, those taking calls at the National Enquiry Centre.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy Counseling: The Key Differences Between QLD and NSW

Surrogacy counselling is one of the most important parts of any surrogacy arrangement, and it is also one of the most commonly misunderstood. That confusion does not just affect intended parents and surrogates. It can also affect lawyers, counsellors, and other professionals involved in the process. The reason is fairly simple. Both Queensland and New… Read More »Surrogacy Counseling: The Key Differences Between QLD and NSW

Surrogacy in Vietnam: The Risks of the Black Market and Restrictive Laws

Surrogacy in Vietnam is legal, but only in a very narrow and tightly controlled way. That is the starting point, and it is the point many intended parents miss. Vietnam stands apart from a number of countries in Asia because it does have a legal framework for surrogacy. On paper, that sounds encouraging. In practice,… Read More »Surrogacy in Vietnam: The Risks of the Black Market and Restrictive Laws

Surrogacy in Cyprus: Understanding the North vs South Divide

Surrogacy in Cyprus sounds, at first glance, like it might offer a Mediterranean alternative for intended parents looking overseas. In reality, Cyprus is not one surrogacy destination but two very different legal and political environments sitting on the same island. That divide matters enormously. For Australians in particular, surrogacy in Cyprus raises serious practical, legal… Read More »Surrogacy in Cyprus: Understanding the North vs South Divide

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board