California Supreme Court Rejects Prop 8 Legal Challenge

California Supreme Court Rejects Prop 8 Legal Challenge

American LGBT groups have reacted with anger and disappointment to the decision of the California Supreme Court to throw out the challenge to Prop 8.

Proposition 8 was the referendum passed last year by a majority of California voters that overturned the earlier decision of the California Supreme Court in the California Marriage Case that validated same sex marriages.

In the latest case, the Supreme Court held that the 18,000 same sex marriages held between the earlier decision and Prop 8 passing were valid, which gay rights activists have labelled a hollow victory.

The court held 6 to 1 that invalidating these marriages would have the effect of “throwing property rights into disarray, destroying the legal interests and expectations of thousands of couples and their families, and potentially undermining the ability of citizens to plan their lives according to the law as it has been determined by this state’s highest court.”
The decision is no surprise. I was able to watch the oral arguments some months ago on the internet. What was apparent to me and other legal commentators at the time, was that from the comments of the judges, this result was the most likely- Prop 8 would be upheld but existing same sex marriages would be validated.
There was an angry demonstration in San Francisco following the decision, resulting in 150 arrests
It is likely that the obvious anger in the LGBT community in California about the decision will galvanise people to organise their own referendum to alter the California Constitution to legalise same sex marriage there.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Representing yourself in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is increasingly common. Cost pressures, the perceived simplicity of some disputes and a desire to stay hands-on drive many people to act without a lawyer. That can work in certain circumstances, but there are important legal and practical limits to be aware of —… Read More »Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

My Surrogacy Reform Wish List for Australia

Australia’s surrogacy framework is fragmented, outdated and producing avoidable harm for intended parents, surrogates and, most importantly, children. A clearer, fairer and nationally consistent approach to surrogacy law reform would reduce cost, stress and legal uncertainty while better protecting human rights and minimising exploitation. Below is a practical wish list for reform that focuses on… Read More »My Surrogacy Reform Wish List for Australia

Harmful proceedings orders

A change that was made to the Family Law Act 1975 in 2024 was to allow the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia and the Family Court of Western Australia to make a harmful proceedings order. This is to stop the never ending cycle of abusive court proceedings, which often stretch on for a decade, and… Read More »Harmful proceedings orders

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board