Comment on proposed Queensland changes

Comment on proposed Queensland changes

The Government is proposing that both children born to lesbian partners have both partners recognised as parents on their birth certificates.

Gay partners are excluded from the proposal. However, if there is a surrogacy arrangement, other than through commercial surrogacy, it is planned that gay couples may be able to be recognised as parents under the planned surrogacy changes.

The proposal is set out in an issues paper released by Attorney-General Cameron Dick.
The proposed changes do not apply to all children born to same sex couples, unlike the laws in the ACT, but mirroring existing laws in NSW, Victoria, WA, the Northern Territory and the Commonwealth which are limited to children conceived via IVF to lesbian couples.

The proposed changes should overcome the difficulties from the Family Court decision in Verner v. Vine, which I have posted about several times before.

In that case, two women who had gone to an IVF clinic argued about whether or not they were in a lesbian relationship. One woman said to the court that they were not, the other said that they were. The judge believed the former, with the result that the latter was denied any relationship with the child born to the other woman. The effect of that decision, until these changes become law, is that some birth mothers in lesbian relationships might try to assert that they were not in a lesbian relationship, with the intent of denying their former partner any relationship with the child, and might succeed in that object.

The changes should allow both partners to register their names as parents, which should mean proper recognition for the co-parent.

Public comment on the proposals is open until 18 September.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

When parents cannot agree about arrangements for their children, the central question for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is not what either parent wants. It is what arrangements are in the best interests of the child. This is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act 1975. It applies whenever a judge… Read More »How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Iran is not a mainstream pathway for Australians, and at present it carries obvious travel, legal and practical risks. Yet for a small group of Iranian-Australian families, it has been a pathway to parenthood that feels culturally familiar, has access to sophisticated IVF treatment, and can result in an Australian child returning home… Read More »Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Surrogacy in Nigeria is becoming a consideration for some Australian intended parents, particularly Australians with Nigerian heritage who are looking to build their family in their country of origin. Nigeria is a large, diverse and increasingly visible destination for international surrogacy. However, it is also a destination that requires exceptional care. The central issue is… Read More »Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board