Australia to Accede to Optional Protocol of CEDAW

Australia to Accede to Optional Protocol of CEDAW

Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Minister for Housing and the Status
of Women Tanya Plibersek have today [26/8/08] welcomed a significant step forward in
the protection and promotion of women’s rights in Australia.

The Rudd Government has tabled a National Interest Analysis, which proposes
that Australia accede to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

Acceding to the Optional Protocol demonstrates the Rudd Government s
positive re-engagement with the United Nations after many years of inaction
on a number of important international instruments, Mr McClelland said.

If Australia is to be taken seriously when it comes to international human
rights, then it’s important that we impose on ourselves the same high
standards we expect of our neighbours.

The Optional Protocol allows Australians to make complaints to the United
Nations about the protection of women’s rights and gender equality when all
domestic avenues for review have been exhausted.

In preparing the National Interest Analysis, a wide-ranging consultation
was conducted with the States, Territories and Non-Government Organisations.

The Government received a high number of positive responses from women’s
groups and community organisations, Ms Plibersek said.

By signing up to the optional protocol, Australia places itself as a global
leader when it comes to women’s rights.

The previous Government refused to become a party to the Optional Protocol,
which came into force in 2000.

The proposal to accede to the Optional Protocol will now be considered by
Parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, which will report by 10
November 2008.

Source: Ministerial Media Release

Comment: The Optional Protocol may well have teeth. Complaints about human rights to international bodies can have major consequences- for example when Nick Toonen complained to the UN Human Rights Committee that he was being discriminated against because he was prosecuted for being gay, the result was the decriminalisation of anti-sodomy laws between consenting adults Australia wide.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy Counseling: The Key Differences Between QLD and NSW

Surrogacy counselling is one of the most important parts of any surrogacy arrangement, and it is also one of the most commonly misunderstood. That confusion does not just affect intended parents and surrogates. It can also affect lawyers, counsellors, and other professionals involved in the process. The reason is fairly simple. Both Queensland and New… Read More »Surrogacy Counseling: The Key Differences Between QLD and NSW

Surrogacy in Vietnam: The Risks of the Black Market and Restrictive Laws

Surrogacy in Vietnam is legal, but only in a very narrow and tightly controlled way. That is the starting point, and it is the point many intended parents miss. Vietnam stands apart from a number of countries in Asia because it does have a legal framework for surrogacy. On paper, that sounds encouraging. In practice,… Read More »Surrogacy in Vietnam: The Risks of the Black Market and Restrictive Laws

Surrogacy in Cyprus: Understanding the North vs South Divide

Surrogacy in Cyprus sounds, at first glance, like it might offer a Mediterranean alternative for intended parents looking overseas. In reality, Cyprus is not one surrogacy destination but two very different legal and political environments sitting on the same island. That divide matters enormously. For Australians in particular, surrogacy in Cyprus raises serious practical, legal… Read More »Surrogacy in Cyprus: Understanding the North vs South Divide

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board