Australia to Accede to Optional Protocol of CEDAW

Australia to Accede to Optional Protocol of CEDAW

Attorney-General Robert McClelland and Minister for Housing and the Status
of Women Tanya Plibersek have today [26/8/08] welcomed a significant step forward in
the protection and promotion of women’s rights in Australia.

The Rudd Government has tabled a National Interest Analysis, which proposes
that Australia accede to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

Acceding to the Optional Protocol demonstrates the Rudd Government s
positive re-engagement with the United Nations after many years of inaction
on a number of important international instruments, Mr McClelland said.

If Australia is to be taken seriously when it comes to international human
rights, then it’s important that we impose on ourselves the same high
standards we expect of our neighbours.

The Optional Protocol allows Australians to make complaints to the United
Nations about the protection of women’s rights and gender equality when all
domestic avenues for review have been exhausted.

In preparing the National Interest Analysis, a wide-ranging consultation
was conducted with the States, Territories and Non-Government Organisations.

The Government received a high number of positive responses from women’s
groups and community organisations, Ms Plibersek said.

By signing up to the optional protocol, Australia places itself as a global
leader when it comes to women’s rights.

The previous Government refused to become a party to the Optional Protocol,
which came into force in 2000.

The proposal to accede to the Optional Protocol will now be considered by
Parliament’s Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, which will report by 10
November 2008.

Source: Ministerial Media Release

Comment: The Optional Protocol may well have teeth. Complaints about human rights to international bodies can have major consequences- for example when Nick Toonen complained to the UN Human Rights Committee that he was being discriminated against because he was prosecuted for being gay, the result was the decriminalisation of anti-sodomy laws between consenting adults Australia wide.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland’s child protection system is facing an urgent and deeply troubling question: why are children who cannot safely return home being left in state care for years, often moving from placement to placement, without genuine consideration of adoption? The recent Child Safety Inquiry has put that question squarely on the table. Its findings are confronting.… Read More »Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland sperm donor family limits explained

  Queensland’s new sperm donor family limits were meant to provide sensible safeguards for children conceived through donor treatment. Instead, Queensland Health has adopted an interpretation that appears to split a female same sex couple into two separate families. That position is difficult to reconcile with the law, common sense, and the lived reality of… Read More »Queensland sperm donor family limits explained

South Australia surrogacy agreements: are they unlawful?

South Australia takes a distinctly narrow approach to surrogacy agreements. The issue is not simply whether a proposed arrangement is altruistic, or whether everyone involved has acted with the best of intentions. Under the Surrogacy Act 2019 (SA), the first question is whether the arrangement falls into the category of a lawful surrogacy agreement. That… Read More »South Australia surrogacy agreements: are they unlawful?

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board