Black Friday meant good luck for many children born through surrogacy – and their parents

Black Friday meant good luck for many children born through surrogacy – and their parents

Friday the 13th, Black Friday, is normally a day of doom and gloom- when things go wrong. However, Black Friday, 13 December 2024 was a good day for many children born through surrogacy – and their parents.

On that date, the Family Law Regulations 1984 (Cth) were replaced by the Family Law Regulations 2024 (Cth), the usual reaction to which would be a yawn.

However, a technical change in the new Regulations has meant that the parentage of many children born overseas through surrogacy has now been rendered certain.

Section 69R of the Family Law Act was long seen as a dead letter for children born overseas. It sets out that a person named on a birth certificate is presumed to be a parent of the child- if the birth certificate issued under an Australian state or territory law- or that of a prescribed overseas jurisdiction.  The problem was that no overseas jurisdiction was every prescribed.

Until 13th December 2024. On that day, many countries were prescribed. Therefore, when children have been born there and have a birth certificate issued there, the people named on the birth certificate as their parents are presumed to be their parents under Australian law. Many of these countries are where Australians have undertaken surrogacy:

Surrogacy destination

  • Brazil
  • Canada – all except Quebec
  • Colombia
  • Denmark
  • Greece
  • Guatemala
  • India
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • Ukraine
  • United Kingdom
  • United States of America

In my view, the changes apply to children born both before and after 13 December 2024.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Relocating with children: what Australian family law requires

Relocating after separation can be an entirely understandable decision. A parent may have a new job, family support, a new relationship, financial pressures or a desire to make a fresh start. But when children are involved, moving a considerable distance can have serious family law consequences. A relocation is not simply about where one parent… Read More »Relocating with children: what Australian family law requires

Australian citizenship surrogacy: Home Affairs wants more proof

Australian intended parents pursuing surrogacy overseas need to be ready for a growing paperwork burden when applying for Australian citizenship by descent. A birth certificate alone may no longer be enough. Recent applications indicate that the Department of Home Affairs is increasingly asking for detailed evidence of the surrogate’s pregnancy and birth records, alongside evidence… Read More »Australian citizenship surrogacy: Home Affairs wants more proof

Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland’s child protection system is facing an urgent and deeply troubling question: why are children who cannot safely return home being left in state care for years, often moving from placement to placement, without genuine consideration of adoption? The recent Child Safety Inquiry has put that question squarely on the table. Its findings are confronting.… Read More »Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board