Brandis: Family Court cuts will increase delay and cost

Brandis: Family Court cuts will increase delay and cost

George Brandis
Shadow Attorney-General Senator George Brandis SC has criticised the Federal Budget for cuts to funding to the Family and Federal Magistrates Courts:

The Family Court has suffered a 6.04% reduction in funding in real terms in last night’s Budget [Budget Paper No. 4, p. 25], on the basis of the Budget’s assumption of 3.25% inflation over 2008-2009. This is more than 3 times the 2% Efficiency Dividend.

The reduction in funding of the Family Court has not been offset by the transfer of resources to the Federal Magistrates Court. In fact, the Federal Magistrates Court has itself suffered a funding reduction of 4.6% in real terms, more than twice the Efficiency Dividend.

The pressures on the Family Court have grown steadily over recent years, while it is common knowledge in the legal profession that the Federal Magistrates Court, which currently deals with about 80% of family law matters, is already overburdened.

It is inconceivable that the Government should think it a good idea to place additional pressure on both of those Courts, with the inevitable result that delays for litigants will be increased and legal costs escalate.

It is particularly surprising that the Government should strip resources away from the adjudication of family law matters when the future structure of the Courts is under review by the Semple Inquiry.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Queensland’s IVF Legislation Crisis Explained

When lawmaking is rushed to meet political timetables, real people can become unintended casualties. Queensland’s recent overhaul of assisted reproductive technology laws provides a clear example: changes intended to protect patients instead created immediate and painful barriers to treatment. How a political deadline turned into a legal problem In 2023, the Queensland government declared regulation… Read More »Queensland’s IVF Legislation Crisis Explained

ALRC Surrogacy Law Review 2025: Expert Submission by Stephen Page

On 5 December 2025, Stephen Page, Director at Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers, submitted a comprehensive response to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s review of Australia’s surrogacy laws. As Australia’s leading surrogacy lawyer, Stephen has advised in over 2,000 surrogacy journeys since 1988—spanning domestic and international arrangements across 39 countries and every known surrogacy… Read More »ALRC Surrogacy Law Review 2025: Expert Submission by Stephen Page

Is the West Australian Surrogacy Act Unconstitutional?

The West Australian Surrogacy Act is at the centre of a constitutional challenge that could transform who may lawfully pursue surrogacy in Western Australia. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court on 18 November 2025, and judgment was expected within six weeks. At stake is whether state surrogacy rules that exclude single men, gay… Read More »Is the West Australian Surrogacy Act Unconstitutional?

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board