California: Attorney-General argues that Proposition 8 invalid

California: Attorney-General argues that Proposition 8 invalid

Californian Attorney-General Jerry Brown Jr has argued in submissions to the California Supreme Court that Proposition 8 is invalid.

His argument is that the right to marry, under the Californian constitution, is an “inalienable” right which the California Supreme Court can only abridge or modify for compelling reasons when the court judges it as “fundamental”. His argument is that because the California Marriage case determined that there was no compelling reason to deny the right to same sex couples, therefore Proposition 8 was invalid.

By contrast, the former Special Prosecutor of President Clinton, Kenneth Starr, now the dean of Malibu based Pepperdine University Law School, argues that Prop 8 is valid and that it invalidates all same sex marriages entered into before it passed.

The case challenging Prop 8 is yet to be decided by the California Supreme Court.

For more, click here [PDF] .

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy Ethics Conference Australia: Key Insights from the Law Council’s First Donor & Surrogacy Ethics Event

Donor & Surrogacy Ethics Conference Recently, I took part in the family law section of the Law Council of Australia’s first surrogacy and donor ethics conference, held in Melbourne. I want to give a shout out to my Melbourne colleague, Sarah Jefford OAM who had the gumption in putting it all together and then roped… Read More »Surrogacy Ethics Conference Australia: Key Insights from the Law Council’s First Donor & Surrogacy Ethics Event

The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) Review of Surrogacy Laws

The Australian Law Reform Commission has released a substantial discussion paper as part of a broad review of surrogacy laws. The paper examines how surrogacy could and should be regulated within Australia, including both domestic arrangements and situations where intended parents commission surrogacy overseas. Submissions on the discussion paper close on 19 December 2024, and… Read More »The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) Review of Surrogacy Laws

Mexico Surrogacy Laws 2025: Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Surrogate Rights

Mexican Supreme Court Judgment The Supreme Court of Mexico in July delivered judgment, Amparo in Revision 63 of 2024, that, in effect, regulates the process of surrogacy in Mexico. This decision is an enormous step forward in protecting the human rights of Mexican surrogates. When obtaining parentage via surrogacy in Mexico, there are two methods:… Read More »Mexico Surrogacy Laws 2025: Supreme Court Ruling Strengthens Surrogate Rights

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board