California: doctors cannot discriminate against lesbians on the basis of religion

California: doctors cannot discriminate against lesbians on the basis of religion

Justice Joyce Kennard
The California Supreme Court has ruled unanimously, in a decision written by Justice Joyce Kennard, in Benitez v. North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group [PDF file], that doctors of the North Coast Women’s Care Medical Group cannot deny medical treatment to people based on their sexual orientation. In 1999, that Group refused to provide fertility treatments to Lupita Benitez because Benitez was a lesbian in a same-sex relationship. In its historic decision, the court ruled that California law prohibited such discrimination and rejected the doctors’ argument that their religious beliefs should enable them to deny treatment based on their religious objections to serving lesbian patients.

History of the case

The trial court rejected the doctors’ defence. The doctors, unhappy with the result, appealed to the Court of Appeal. That court held that the doctors had to be given an opportunity to demonstrate that their refusal to treat Lupita Benitez was not based on her sexual orientation. Lupita Benitez then appealed to the California Supreme Court.

The California Supreme Court said:

Do the rights of religious freedom and free speech, as guaranteed in both
the federal and the California Constitutions, exempt a medical clinic’s physicians
from complying with the California Unruh Civil Rights Act’s prohibition against
discrimination based on a person’s sexual orientation? Our answer is no.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Why is male fertility declining? Experts weigh in

Male fertility decline has become one of the most important and unsettling questions in reproductive medicine. There appears to have been a clear decline in sperm quality over the past 50 years, but the difficult truth is that there is no single, settled explanation. That was one of the central messages delivered by United States… Read More »Why is male fertility declining? Experts weigh in

Trump’s New Order Threatens Foreign Surrogacy Babies

Two new executive orders issued by President Trump have created serious uncertainty for foreign intended parents pursuing surrogacy in the United States. For Australians, the concern is immediate and practical: will intended parents be able to travel to the United States for the birth of their child, and will that child be recognised as a… Read More »Trump’s New Order Threatens Foreign Surrogacy Babies

Parental leave surrogacy: what surrogates and parents can claim

Parental leave is one of those practical issues that can be overlooked in the excitement and complexity of a surrogacy arrangement. Yet it matters enormously. Time away from work is needed for the birth, recovery, bonding, medical appointments, travel and the first intense weeks of caring for a newborn. For surrogates, intended parents and a… Read More »Parental leave surrogacy: what surrogates and parents can claim

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board