Case: de facto relationship, but why would you bother?

Case: de facto relationship, but why would you bother?

In Delaney v Burgess the appellant de facto wife was able to show that the trial judge was incorrect in finding that her relationship with the de facto husband was only a business relationship of boarder and owner of the home, when amongst other things, they had had sex, he had described her affectionately in a card as his “wife”, in children’s proceedings had sworn that she was his de facto wife and listed her as his flying companion with Qantas.

However, after a relationship of 4 years, when the de facto husband had $450,000+ of property and superannuation, the de facto wife was ordered to be paid $15,000 plus costs of the appeal [all of which would be likely to be fraction of what she had paid in legal costs]. The de facto wife had made little financial contributions during the course of the relationship other than board in part because she had a gambling problem. Why would you bother going to court for such a small sum?

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

NSW Surrogacy FAIL: What Lawyers Got Wrong and How to Avoid It

Surrogacy journeys should be joyous and smooth pathways to parenthood, but unfortunately, legal missteps can turn them into complex, frustrating ordeals.

Jenny’s Bid for Reproductive Freedom

“Jenny” is a single woman living in Western Australia. Five years ago, she decided to do what many single women have done, and freeze her eggs for possible later use.

Monash IVF Mix-Up & Fertility Law Shake-Up in Queensland

In recent months, Queensland has seen two major incidents that have sent ripples through the assisted reproductive technology (ART) community, highlighting the delicate nature of fertility treatments and the urgent need for thoughtful regulation.

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board