Case: interim decision about violence

Case: interim decision about violence

In Schafer and Becker, the mother sought to limit the amount of time that the father had with the children, based on her assertion that he was violent.

The most significant evidence that the mother had about the violence was that when the child E: “returns from time spent with his Father he is “out of control”, “violent”, “destructive” and “abusive”, and in particular he is violent and abusive towards his Mother and family members” and “the Father, in the presence of the Child E, “went berserk” screamed very aggressively, and was yelling and spitting, and was so angry at the Mother that the Mother says she was fearful for her safety”.

The mother sought to rely on police documents including the father’s criminal history.

Federal Magistrate Lucev ruled that on an interim basis the police documents were inadmissible because:

“The documents:
do not reveal that any family or domestic violence orders have been taken out;
do not reveal that there has been any violence in, or in relation to the Children, or that they have been exposed to any violence; and
reveal that the one matter which went to Court (involving the Father and the police), and upon which considerable emphasis was placed in the hearing, was dismissed with a costs order in favour of the Father.
In the circumstances, the bundle of often repetitious hearsay documents which reveal no actual or potential risk of exposure of the Children to violence, and which seek to potentially significantly prejudice the Father will not be admitted for the purposes of the interim application.”

The mother was ultimately unsuccessful on limiting the amount of time based on the issue of violence- there was simply not enough evidence.

An illustration perhaps of the need to ensure that affidavit material is extremely thorough, even at an interim stage, when relying on allegations of violence. Or put another way- plenty of assertion, not enough evidence.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

When parents cannot agree about arrangements for their children, the central question for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is not what either parent wants. It is what arrangements are in the best interests of the child. This is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act 1975. It applies whenever a judge… Read More »How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Iran is not a mainstream pathway for Australians, and at present it carries obvious travel, legal and practical risks. Yet for a small group of Iranian-Australian families, it has been a pathway to parenthood that feels culturally familiar, has access to sophisticated IVF treatment, and can result in an Australian child returning home… Read More »Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Surrogacy in Nigeria is becoming a consideration for some Australian intended parents, particularly Australians with Nigerian heritage who are looking to build their family in their country of origin. Nigeria is a large, diverse and increasingly visible destination for international surrogacy. However, it is also a destination that requires exceptional care. The central issue is… Read More »Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board