Case: Superannuation Complaints Tribunal: pay super to grandma or the son?

Case: Superannuation Complaints Tribunal: pay super to grandma or the son?

Another example of the need to get on with property settlement instead of leaving a mess…

In a recent decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal,the Trustee’s decision was to pay 100% of the death benefit for the benefit of the minor son of the Deceased Member, with the Former Spouse as the trustee. The Son was aged 12 at the time of the member’s death.

The complaint was brought by the mother of the Deceased Member, who wanted to receive funds to clear overdrafts and credit card debt, mortgage repayments and additional medical expenses and to provide for her grandson “as the [Deceased Member] would have wished”. She also claimed that she and her husband (the stepfather of the Deceased Member) were in an interdependency relationship with the Deceased Member at the time of his death. The Tribunal found that the Complainant and her husband had provided the Deceased Member with substantial financial support and received minimal financial support from the Deceased Member. It also found that the person that the Deceased Member had a primary obligation to support was clearly his son.

Amongst other things, the Complainant submitted that the Deceased Member had lived with her and her husband for over 6 years prior to his death. The Tribunal noted conflicting information provided by the Former Spouse as to the domestic living arrangements of the Deceased Member.

While the Tribunal did not make a finding of fact as to with whom the Deceased Member was living at the time of his death, it dismissed the Complainant’s submission that she was in an “interdependency relationship” with the Deceased Member, stating that the circumstances of the relationship were not, and could not be expected to remain, ongoing and permanent. However, the Tribunal did find that the Complainant and her husband were partially financially dependent upon the Deceased Member at the time of death. As a result, it set aside the Trustee decision and substituted its own decision to pay 10% of the benefit to the Complainant and her husband jointly and 90% to the Former Spouse as trustee for the son.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy in Mexico

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page deep dives into all the crucial information you need to know about Surrogacy in Mexico.

Surrogacy in Australia or US: Which is the Best?

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page, breaks down the surrogacy process in Australia versus the United States. 

Family Court: embryos are property for the purposes of property settlement

There has been a recent decision by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dealing with embryos as property. I just want to start with the implications of that decision. The first is that anyone who is separating who has embryos, sperm or eggs in storage may be able to get relief from the… Read More »Family Court: embryos are property for the purposes of property settlement

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board