Case: USA Unlawful Dismissal because worker sacked due to domestic violence complaint

Case: USA Unlawful Dismissal because worker sacked due to domestic violence complaint

A recent US case,Steel v Snowline Industries, from Oregon, is a useful illustration of how domestic violence matters can impact at work.

Allison Steel sought and was granted a civil protection order against an abusive co-worker, which prevented him from coming to work. Soon after, she was fired by their employer Snowline Manufacturing Oregon.

Allison Steel took Snowline to court alleging unlawful dismissal. She was successful, obtaining a payout of $27,500, part of which was under the common law. In addition to any statutory rights, workers in Australia may have rights under common law.

The jury, apparently for the first time,found that the employer had breached an Oregon statute which prohibits retaliation for initiating or testifying in a civil proceeding or for filing a criminal complaint, and applied it to a domestic violence victim’s application for or seeking enforcement of a restraining order or reporting an abuser’s criminal activity.

In Australia if the employer’s behaviours were to be repeated, aside from the possibility of the payout, the employer and its various responsible managers/directors may have committed criminal offences. For example, the Criminal Code Queensland provides:

A person who, without reasonable cause, causes, or threatens
to cause, any injury or detriment to a …………witness…..or a
member of the family of a ….. witness ….. in retaliation because
of—…
(b) anything lawfully done by the …..witness in any
judicial proceeding; is guilty of a crime.
Maximum penalty—7 years imprisonment.

If as an employer you sack (or even threaten to sack) an employee because they are making complaint to police about a fellow employee who is alleged to be committing domestic violence against the first employee, you may be looking at jail time.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

WA surrogacy parents: register now for parentage orders

Western Australians who have had a child through surrogacy, whether in Western Australia, elsewhere in Australia or overseas, may soon have an important opportunity to obtain legal recognition as parents. The Western Australian Government is seeking registrations from past surrogacy parents who do not have a parentage order. This is particularly significant for families who… Read More »WA surrogacy parents: register now for parentage orders

Parenting plans vs consent orders explained

When parents separate, one of the most important questions is how arrangements for children will be recorded. Will the agreement be kept flexible through a parenting plan, or formalised in legally binding consent orders? There is no single answer that suits every family. The right option depends on the level of trust between parents, the… Read More »Parenting plans vs consent orders explained

Sperm donor family limit in Queensland explained

Queensland’s new sperm donor family limit was intended to create clarity, consistency and better access to donor sperm. Instead, guidance issued to IVF clinics has produced a result that appears to halve donor access for many lesbian couples. The legislation provides for a 10-family limit. Yet where two women are in a couple and seek… Read More »Sperm donor family limit in Queensland explained

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board