Changes to Applcations to Consent Orders

Changes to Applcations to Consent Orders

The usual way in which agreements are made about parenting matters and property settlements, by way of consent orders, has just changed slightly becasue of changes to the application for consent orders.

This is what the Family Court recently released:

On July 1, 2008, the Chief Justice approved in accordance with rule 24.04(1) of the Family Law Rules 2004, a new Application for Consent Orders form which amends the previous form. In summary, the main changes to the Application for Consent Orders form are:
1. The requirement to physically attach the draft consent orders to the form has been relaxed and now the draft orders need only be lodged with the Application for Consent Orders and each party must have dated those draft orders the same day that the party swore or affirmed their respective affidavit in Part I, K or M of the form.[ Hooray, now the Family Court has dropped the nitpicking requirement for the consent orders to be stapled to the application, and the two documents can be given to the court together at the same time, like many other court documents. It was not enough that both documents were signed by the same people, using the same signatures, presumably at the same time they signed the applications- they also had to be stapled together. If the two documents weren’t stapled to each other, the documents would cop a requisition notice from the court, delaying the whole process.]
2. The new form includes some additional questions about superannuation to provide the court with information about any:
(a) prior payment splitting orders; and
(b) surcharge debts related to the relevant superannuation interest.
Parties who are in the process of finalising their arrangements for draft consent orders may have done so utilising the previous Application for Consent Orders form and in order to allow parties who have almost concluded their negotiations to utilise the previous form, parties may lodge the Application for Consent Orders form in the version which was in force on June 30, 2008, until October 1, 2008.
After October 1, 2008, Applications for Consent Orders lodged in the previous form by post will be returned to the sender with a short note requesting the parties to utilise the current form. Those persons seeking to lodge the form at any court registry will be told the same thing. If a party contends that in the special circumstances of their case, an application in the old form should be accepted after October 1, 2008, the form should be lodged (either by post or in person) with a covering letter explaining the special circumstances justifying why the form should be accepted for filing.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

De facto relationship: what counts under family law?

Sharing a home does not automatically make two people a de facto couple. Equally, living apart does not necessarily mean that a de facto relationship cannot exist. Under Australian family law, the question involves more than an address. The central issue is whether the couple’s relationship amounts to living together on a genuine domestic basis.… Read More »De facto relationship: what counts under family law?

Paid egg donation in Australia: is it legal?

Can someone be paid to donate eggs in Australia? The short answer is no. Human eggs cannot lawfully be treated as something to buy or sell. Australia permits altruistic egg donation, not commercial egg donation. But that is not the end of the story. A donor may be reimbursed for reasonable expenses associated with the… Read More »Paid egg donation in Australia: is it legal?

Egg Freezing in Prison: The High Court’s Decision in Smith

Does a prison sentence also mean losing the opportunity to become a parent after release? That question sits at the heart of Smith v Chief Executive, Queensland Corrective Services, a powerful High Court decision about egg freezing, fertility preservation and the limits of punishment. The High Court unanimously found that egg freezing did not fall… Read More »Egg Freezing in Prison: The High Court’s Decision in Smith

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board