Doriemus- amusing case names

Doriemus- amusing case names

Well it had to happen…

When the Family Law Act was enacted, one of the key changes was to have secrecy provisions. This was because one of the staples of the media before its enactment were articles about the latest divorce drama.

The new s.121 of the Family Law Act provided that court proceedings were open to the public, but with some limited exceptions, there could not be publication of people’s identities.

One of those exceptions was for the use of lawyers in law reports. Lawyers were therefore able to rely on the names of cases when they argued matters in court.

Then came the rise and rise of the internet, and the decision of the Family Court and the Federal Magistrates Court to publish decisions online. Of course one of the features of publishing online is that anyone can look at the decisions.

The Family Court still reported its significant decisions by name, but the Federal Magistrates Court did so by letter, so that soon we had numerous decisions such as C v. C.

Talk about confusing! There was nothing to distinguish the name of one C v C against another, aside from the citation. Even more confusing for counsel and judges- some judges wanted to refer to the case names, as opposed to the initials!

So now the Family Law Courts are often resorting to pseudonyms. At least this helps preserve the anonymity of the litigants, and enables judges and lawyers to rely on recognised case names.

However, if we are going to rely on good case names, at least we might have amusing ones!

Several that have struck my fancy are : Vanderhum Doriemus, named after the two legendary racehorses, and Wenceslas and DOCS, named after the Christmas carol, and Wilde and Clives .

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

ART Update from Australia: Stephen Page Presents at South African Family Law Conference

On 11–13 March 2026, Stephen Page, Director at Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers, presented remotely at the prestigious 28th Annual MDT/UWC Global Family Law Conference in Cape Town, South Africa. As Australia’s leading surrogacy lawyer and an Accredited Family Law Specialist since 1996, Stephen delivered “ART Update from Australia”—a comprehensive overview of Australia’s evolving… Read More »ART Update from Australia: Stephen Page Presents at South African Family Law Conference

3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

When intended parents consider international surrogacy, the legal and ethical landscape can be treacherous. One government has taken a blunt but pragmatic approach: rather than issuing a blanket prohibition on overseas commercial surrogacy, it has published a short list of specific countries where surrogacy arrangements will almost certainly jeopardise a child’s legal status. That list… Read More »3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Representing yourself in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is increasingly common. Cost pressures, the perceived simplicity of some disputes and a desire to stay hands-on drive many people to act without a lawyer. That can work in certain circumstances, but there are important legal and practical limits to be aware of —… Read More »Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board