Doriemus- amusing case names

Doriemus- amusing case names

Well it had to happen…

When the Family Law Act was enacted, one of the key changes was to have secrecy provisions. This was because one of the staples of the media before its enactment were articles about the latest divorce drama.

The new s.121 of the Family Law Act provided that court proceedings were open to the public, but with some limited exceptions, there could not be publication of people’s identities.

One of those exceptions was for the use of lawyers in law reports. Lawyers were therefore able to rely on the names of cases when they argued matters in court.

Then came the rise and rise of the internet, and the decision of the Family Court and the Federal Magistrates Court to publish decisions online. Of course one of the features of publishing online is that anyone can look at the decisions.

The Family Court still reported its significant decisions by name, but the Federal Magistrates Court did so by letter, so that soon we had numerous decisions such as C v. C.

Talk about confusing! There was nothing to distinguish the name of one C v C against another, aside from the citation. Even more confusing for counsel and judges- some judges wanted to refer to the case names, as opposed to the initials!

So now the Family Law Courts are often resorting to pseudonyms. At least this helps preserve the anonymity of the litigants, and enables judges and lawyers to rely on recognised case names.

However, if we are going to rely on good case names, at least we might have amusing ones!

Several that have struck my fancy are : Vanderhum Doriemus, named after the two legendary racehorses, and Wenceslas and DOCS, named after the Christmas carol, and Wilde and Clives .

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Parenting plans vs consent orders explained

When parents separate, one of the most important questions is how arrangements for children will be recorded. Will the agreement be kept flexible through a parenting plan, or formalised in legally binding consent orders? There is no single answer that suits every family. The right option depends on the level of trust between parents, the… Read More »Parenting plans vs consent orders explained

Sperm donor family limit in Queensland explained

Queensland’s new sperm donor family limit was intended to create clarity, consistency and better access to donor sperm. Instead, guidance issued to IVF clinics has produced a result that appears to halve donor access for many lesbian couples. The legislation provides for a 10-family limit. Yet where two women are in a couple and seek… Read More »Sperm donor family limit in Queensland explained

NSW fertility inquiry: surrogacy evidence under scrutiny

The New South Wales Legislative Council fertility inquiry is examining difficult and practical questions about access to assisted reproductive treatment. Distance matters. Cost matters. Regulation matters. For many people trying to create a family, these are not abstract policy concerns. They can determine whether treatment is available at all. Among the issues before the inquiry… Read More »NSW fertility inquiry: surrogacy evidence under scrutiny

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board