DSM V researchers still hard at work…

DSM V researchers still hard at work…

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (or DSM) is the primary clinical tool used by psychiatrists around the world. The current edition, which is a revised version of the fourth edition, is therefore called DSM IV TR.

Inevitably, the DSM has often figured large in family law cases, where it is often unfortunately necessary for one or both parties to be assessed psychiatrically. Any psychiatrist undertaking that assessment relies on the Bible of that profession, the DSM.

The significance of the DSM cannot be overstated- through its prism psychiatrists are able to diagnose conditions, for example schizophrenia, or borderline personality disorder, so its statement of conditions as well as their symptoms can be critically important.

With this importance in mind, efforts to update the DSM to a fifth edition, or to use the jargon, DSM V, are of utmost importance, not only to psychiatrists but those affected by their assessments, including family law litigants. In a process that is taking years, and involves high powered committees, those who believe that they might gain from the new edition have been lobbying for inclusion or changes.

For example, some groups in favour of Parental Alienation Syndrome have lobbied to have it included in the DSM V and have it recognised as a syndrome. Others are equally keen to ensure that PAS remains where it is now, not recognised by the scientific community as a syndrome.

Currently, according to Psychiatric News, work is powering under way with a conference in New York, where vital questions have been asked such as:

First, what is a mental disorder? Is it symptoms? disease? functional disability? Should variants in behavior be considered disorders, and if so, how much variation?

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

When parents cannot agree about arrangements for their children, the central question for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is not what either parent wants. It is what arrangements are in the best interests of the child. This is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act 1975. It applies whenever a judge… Read More »How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Iran is not a mainstream pathway for Australians, and at present it carries obvious travel, legal and practical risks. Yet for a small group of Iranian-Australian families, it has been a pathway to parenthood that feels culturally familiar, has access to sophisticated IVF treatment, and can result in an Australian child returning home… Read More »Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Surrogacy in Nigeria is becoming a consideration for some Australian intended parents, particularly Australians with Nigerian heritage who are looking to build their family in their country of origin. Nigeria is a large, diverse and increasingly visible destination for international surrogacy. However, it is also a destination that requires exceptional care. The central issue is… Read More »Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board