Family Court case: $50,000 security for costs

Family Court case: $50,000 security for costs

The Full Court of the Family Court in the recent case of Fennessy and Gregorian (Security for Costs) had to determine applications for security costs brought by the mother, independent children’s lawyer and the Department of Child Safety against the father, who was appealing from a trial judge’s orders.

The court reviewed the principles in Luadaka as to security for costs, followed them, and then found that although on the one hand the father said that he had sufficient, unspecified, funds to pay for the appeal, but on the other said could not pay security for costs, and determined that a sum of $50,000 as security for costs for the other three parties was appropriate.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

The Complexity of Surrogacy in Australia

In this video, Stephen Page from Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers explores the complexities surrounding surrogacy in Australia.

Proposed Changes to Assisted Reproductive Technology in New South Wales

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page discusses the proposed changes to assisted reproductive technology in New South Wales.

Do Grandparents Have Rights in Family Law

In this video, Bruce Provan, Managing Director of Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers, addresses the important issue of grandparents’ rights in Australia.

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board