Family Court case: $50,000 security for costs

Family Court case: $50,000 security for costs

The Full Court of the Family Court in the recent case of Fennessy and Gregorian (Security for Costs) had to determine applications for security costs brought by the mother, independent children’s lawyer and the Department of Child Safety against the father, who was appealing from a trial judge’s orders.

The court reviewed the principles in Luadaka as to security for costs, followed them, and then found that although on the one hand the father said that he had sufficient, unspecified, funds to pay for the appeal, but on the other said could not pay security for costs, and determined that a sum of $50,000 as security for costs for the other three parties was appropriate.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy in Mexico

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page deep dives into all the crucial information you need to know about Surrogacy in Mexico.

Surrogacy in Australia or US: Which is the Best?

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page, breaks down the surrogacy process in Australia versus the United States. 

Family Court: embryos are property for the purposes of property settlement

There has been a recent decision by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia dealing with embryos as property. I just want to start with the implications of that decision. The first is that anyone who is separating who has embryos, sperm or eggs in storage may be able to get relief from the… Read More »Family Court: embryos are property for the purposes of property settlement

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board