Family Court case: $50,000 security for costs

The Full Court of the Family Court in the recent case of Fennessy and Gregorian (Security for Costs) had to determine applications for security costs brought by the mother, independent children’s lawyer and the Department of Child Safety against the father, who was appealing from a trial judge’s orders. The court reviewed the principles in… Read More »Custom Single Post Header

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board

Family Court case: $50,000 security for costs

The Full Court of the Family Court in the recent case of Fennessy and Gregorian (Security for Costs) had to determine applications for security costs brought by the mother, independent children’s lawyer and the Department of Child Safety against the father, who was appealing from a trial judge’s orders.

The court reviewed the principles in Luadaka as to security for costs, followed them, and then found that although on the one hand the father said that he had sufficient, unspecified, funds to pay for the appeal, but on the other said could not pay security for costs, and determined that a sum of $50,000 as security for costs for the other three parties was appropriate.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

What is the Fertility Society of Australia & New Zealand

In this video, Accredited Family Law Specialist and Page Provan Director Stephen Page introduces the Fertility Society of Australia & New Zealand and this organization’s critical role in the IVF industry.

What is Access Australia & Why You Need to Know About it

In this video, Accredited Family Law Specialist and Page Provan Director Stephen Page explains what Access Australia is and how it helps those who need assisted reproductive treatment.

Who Is a Parent Then – Is Three a Crowd?

Stephen Page’s Paper presented to the Legal Services Commission, Adelaide on 19 November, 2021.