Family Court case: keep it short and to the point

In the recent Full Court of the Family Court case of Dylan and Dylan, appeals were made about both property and children’s matters. The Full Court judgment is most significant because of its beginning, which is this shot across the bows of trial judges: Some sublime articulations of legal principles and of the philosophies and… Read More »Custom Single Post Header

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board

Family Court case: keep it short and to the point

In the recent Full Court of the Family Court case of Dylan and Dylan, appeals were made about both property and children’s matters.

The Full Court judgment is most significant because of its beginning, which is this shot across the bows of trial judges:

Some sublime articulations of legal principles and of the philosophies and policies underpinning them appear in cases in which the expression was not strictly necessary to the disposition of the particular cause. However, usually, the statements were closely connected with the essential legal points in the case and were made by appellate courts, with a responsibility for development and explication of the law.

A trial judge’s primary function is to decide the case before the court and explain the result, but from time to time a trial judge too might go beyond that task and do so to the great benefit of the law. However, a trial judge embarking upon discussion superfluous to the discharge of the primary role may provoke an appeal, based on the proposition that the irrelevant considerations may have influenced the final result.
That is one of the arguments in this appeal.

If such a judgment is to survive, the appeal court may well need to find that the discussion could not possibly be connected to the result. That finding may provoke the thought that the discussion in the trial judgment might have been better placed in a law journal.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Forced Marriage

On November 1st 2023, Accredited Family Law Specialist and Page Provan Director Stephen Page presented a paper at the Brisbane Zonta Club about forced marriage. I acknowledge the Jagera and Turrbal peoples, on whose lands we meet today, their elders, past, present and emerging. Ruqia Hidari was aged 21 and living in Victoria, when, according to police,… Read More »Forced Marriage

ACT Government Surrogacy Bill

The ACT Government has today introduced a bill to amend the ACT’s surrogacy laws. The proposed changes are more incremental than fundamental. They include allowing a single person to undertake surrogacy, for the surrogate to be single if needed, a requirement for legal advice and counselling beforehand, a written agreement being required, that traditional surrogacy is… Read More »ACT Government Surrogacy Bill

Planning to resolve: ADR in ART

ADR can help resolve disputes in ART cases. ADR is not limited to mediation and arbitration. Other types of informal dispute resolution can resolve disputes. When assisted reproductive treatment cases go off the rails, they can have the next level of bitterness and volatility. There can be a keen sense of betrayal when things don’t… Read More »Planning to resolve: ADR in ART