Family Court- secret family violence best practice principles

Family Court- secret family violence best practice principles

A month ago I posted about how the Family Court had stated that it had issued best practice principles about family violence.

No doubt good stuff- but where were these principles? Nowhere to be seen.

I then wrote to the court’s media officer. Here is the substantive response, which I have just received:

I apologise for raising expectations via the media release on the
FVBPP – the purpose was to tell parties and practitioners that, in addition to
the programs and processes they might utilise when violence is alleged,there was
activity ‘behind the scenes’ as well to address violence.
The release clearly begged the question because I have had numerous
requests for copies of the FVBPP or questions why they can’t be found on
the website.However, the FVBPP are for the guidance of the judges and as present
they are not available to a wider audience.

The courts pride themselves on transparency. When judges make decisions in which their reasons are not completely transparent, they are rightly criticised on appeal.

For the sake of transparency, the court ought to release the principles for public scrutiny. If US courts can do so, there ought to be no reason that the Family Court cannot do so. When the Family Court published its family violence policy, it did so in the public eye, after much public consultation.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

When parents cannot agree about arrangements for their children, the central question for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is not what either parent wants. It is what arrangements are in the best interests of the child. This is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act 1975. It applies whenever a judge… Read More »How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Iran is not a mainstream pathway for Australians, and at present it carries obvious travel, legal and practical risks. Yet for a small group of Iranian-Australian families, it has been a pathway to parenthood that feels culturally familiar, has access to sophisticated IVF treatment, and can result in an Australian child returning home… Read More »Surrogacy in Iran: a complex and risky journey

Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Surrogacy in Nigeria is becoming a consideration for some Australian intended parents, particularly Australians with Nigerian heritage who are looking to build their family in their country of origin. Nigeria is a large, diverse and increasingly visible destination for international surrogacy. However, it is also a destination that requires exceptional care. The central issue is… Read More »Surrogacy in Nigeria: the legal risks for Australians

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board