Federal Magistrates Court case- extending full and frank disclosure to child support reviews

Federal Magistrates Court case- extending full and frank disclosure to child support reviews

Federal Magistrate Slack in Humphries and Berry (SSAT appeal) has held that the principle of disclosure applies to the whole of the review process of child support assessments, including the proceedings before the Social Security Appeals Tribunal.

The principle of disclosure includes where a party is required to make full and frank disclosure of their financial circumstances in a timely manner to the other party. It has been described as a case of “show and tell” not “hide and seek” described as a case of “show and tell” not “hide and seek”.

Federal Magistrate Slack said:

I consider that these principles applicable to full and frank disclosure in proceedings in the Family Court have the same force in administrative review hearings under the Child Support Registration and Collection Act including appeal hearings by the SSAT.

Although the SSAT has the power to obtain information (s.103K) and the power to require the Child Support Registrar to exercise powers under the Assessment Act and the Child Support Registration and Collection Act for the purposes of gaining information relevant to a review (s.103L), there nevertheless remains a primary duty and obligation on the parties to the review to make a full and complete disclosure of their financial affairs relevant to the matter before the hearing and a duty to assist the Tribunal to come to its determination in the application. The obligation to disclose information and documents extends to the presentation of that material in a way that the true nature of their financial affairs can be readily understood.
The obligation extends not just to providing financial records but also includes presenting the information in a way that can be reasonably and readily understood and examined.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Can I Move Away With My Child? Relocation Law in Australia

Relocation cases sit among the most difficult parenting disputes in Australian family law. They usually arise when one parent wants to move with a child, or has already moved, in a way that reduces the other parent’s time or involvement. That move might be to another suburb, another regional town, another state, or overseas. These… Read More »Can I Move Away With My Child? Relocation Law in Australia

Who is a Parent By Stephen Page

The question sounds simple. Who is a parent? In law, it is anything but simple. Biology matters. Birth matters. Intention matters. Paperwork matters. State law matters. Federal law matters. Sometimes they line up neatly. Sometimes they collide in ways that leave families, lawyers and government departments wrestling with very uncomfortable uncertainty. That is especially true… Read More »Who is a Parent By Stephen Page

Posthumous Conception in Victoria: Retrieval, Consent, and the Law

Posthumous conception cases in Victoria sit at the intersection of grief, medicine, and strict statutory rules. They are deeply personal matters, but they are also highly technical. Timing matters. Consent matters. Process matters. And one of the hardest truths for families is that retrieving eggs, sperm, or embryos is often easier than being legally allowed… Read More »Posthumous Conception in Victoria: Retrieval, Consent, and the Law

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board