FMC case: the recent migrant

FMC case: the recent migrant

In the recent Federal Magistrates Court case of Maguire and Richter, Federal Magistrate Brown considered a property settlement when the parties’ circumstances were poor, their relationship was brief, and the wife sought an adjustment in part because she migrated to Australia from Germany, leaving her worse off.

Brown FM did not allow any adjustment for the migration issue. His Honour held:

It is the wife’s position that she has suffered a more significant diminution in her standard of living than the husband in the period since separation. I accept that this is so. The husband has had the benefit of living in the former matrimonial home, but he owned this property prior to the parties’ marriage.
It is also the case that the wife has been at a significant disadvantage following separation, because she has been compelled to live in an environment where she feels herself to be “amid the alien corn”. However, the wife freely chose to come to Australia and pursue a new life here. It is also open to her to return to Germany, where she has secure employment awaiting her.
At present, the wife can see many attractions of remaining living in [L]. She has made friends in [L]. She apparently enjoys the lifestyle and climate of Australia….

The wife complains about the social consequences of the failed marriage from her point of view. She has been transplanted from her native soil and given up opportunities there. However, this was a decision she freely made and, although it is not likely to be more financially advantageous to her to remain in Australia, she has chosen not to return to Germany. By necessary implication, she can see some advantages to her of living in this country.
I am satisfied both parties entered the marriage with a genuine intention to make it succeed. As a result, both made compromises to this end. Now both suffer consequences as a result of the marriage’s failure. I do not think that these various factors, when balanced against each other, justify any further distribution of property in either parties favour.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Colombia Surrogacy Update: The Bill That Died

Planning surrogacy in Colombia can feel like navigating two legal systems at the same time. There is what Colombia does (or decides not to do). And there is what Australian law requires of intended parents, even when the arrangement happens overseas. A recent development in Colombia matters because it affects whether foreign intended parents may… Read More »Colombia Surrogacy Update: The Bill That Died

High Net Worth Divorce: What You Need to Know

When a relationship ends, the legal rules about dividing property, superannuation, and financial responsibilities do not magically change just because someone is wealthy. The same family law principles still apply. But high net worth divorces bring a different level of complexity. In practical terms, these are cases where couples separation involves significant assets and superannuation,… Read More »High Net Worth Divorce: What You Need to Know

Iran Surrogacy: Critical Warning for Australian Intended Parents

International surrogacy can feel like the only path forward when home options are limited. For some Australian intended parents, Iran has been on the shortlist, particularly for those of Iranian heritage who were trying to navigate infertility treatment and surrogacy within Iranian law. However, the risks associated with Iran surrogacy must be seriously considered. But… Read More »Iran Surrogacy: Critical Warning for Australian Intended Parents

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board