FMC case: the recent migrant

FMC case: the recent migrant

In the recent Federal Magistrates Court case of Maguire and Richter, Federal Magistrate Brown considered a property settlement when the parties’ circumstances were poor, their relationship was brief, and the wife sought an adjustment in part because she migrated to Australia from Germany, leaving her worse off.

Brown FM did not allow any adjustment for the migration issue. His Honour held:

It is the wife’s position that she has suffered a more significant diminution in her standard of living than the husband in the period since separation. I accept that this is so. The husband has had the benefit of living in the former matrimonial home, but he owned this property prior to the parties’ marriage.
It is also the case that the wife has been at a significant disadvantage following separation, because she has been compelled to live in an environment where she feels herself to be “amid the alien corn”. However, the wife freely chose to come to Australia and pursue a new life here. It is also open to her to return to Germany, where she has secure employment awaiting her.
At present, the wife can see many attractions of remaining living in [L]. She has made friends in [L]. She apparently enjoys the lifestyle and climate of Australia….

The wife complains about the social consequences of the failed marriage from her point of view. She has been transplanted from her native soil and given up opportunities there. However, this was a decision she freely made and, although it is not likely to be more financially advantageous to her to remain in Australia, she has chosen not to return to Germany. By necessary implication, she can see some advantages to her of living in this country.
I am satisfied both parties entered the marriage with a genuine intention to make it succeed. As a result, both made compromises to this end. Now both suffer consequences as a result of the marriage’s failure. I do not think that these various factors, when balanced against each other, justify any further distribution of property in either parties favour.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Don’t Waive Your Rights! Understanding Legal Privilege in Family & Surrogacy Law

Legal professional privilege is one of those legal concepts that sounds technical, but it protects something very practical and very important: the confidentiality of communications between a lawyer and a client. In family law and fertility law matters, that protection can make a real difference. It applies in obvious settings such as litigation, but it… Read More »Don’t Waive Your Rights! Understanding Legal Privilege in Family & Surrogacy Law

What Intended Parents Should Have Ready Before Their First Consultation With a Surrogacy Lawyer

By Olga Pysana – Co-founder Family By Choice, Independent International Surrogacy Consultant (The Surrogacy Insider) For many intended parents, the first consultation with a surrogacy lawyer is the moment the journey becomes real. After months, sometimes years, of fertility treatment, research, and conversations with their partner, they finally sit down with a legal professional to… Read More »What Intended Parents Should Have Ready Before Their First Consultation With a Surrogacy Lawyer

Why Education Is the Missing Piece in the Surrogacy Journey

By Sanja Jovanović, Founder & Director of Family By Choice With the ALRC’s final report on surrogacy law reform due in July 2026, Australia is on the cusp of the most significant changes to its surrogacy framework in a generation. Proposals for nationally consistent legislation, regulated surrogacy support organisations, and new pathways for compensating surrogates… Read More »Why Education Is the Missing Piece in the Surrogacy Journey

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board