Government rejects Kirby’s request for equality

Government rejects Kirby’s request for equality

Justices Ian Callinan
Michael Kirby
Within the next year or so, two of the country’s most distinguished jurists, Justices Ian Callinan (left) and Michael Kirby (right)are due to retire from the High Court. Justice Callinan is married. Justice Kirby is gay, having been in the same relationship for 38 years.

If Justice Callinan dies, his widow receives a pension for the rest of her life. If Justice Kirby dies before his partner, then his partner will not be entitled- because his partner is gay.

This discrimination was identified in the recent Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission report, in which it was suggested that it ought to be changed. At the time, Commonwealth Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock said that the Government would consider each change on a case by case basis.

It was reported last week that Justice Kirby had written to the Government last week, noting the discrimination, and seeking that the law be changed. As of Thursday last week,gay activist Rodney Croome and representatives from the Queensland Association for Healthy Communities and PFLAG met with officers from the Attoreny-General’s department.

Any joy about removing the discrimination for Justice Kirby was shortlived- Mr Ruddock rejected any proposed change for Justice Kirby ahead of any broad ranging reform.

See article in The Australian.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland’s child protection system is facing an urgent and deeply troubling question: why are children who cannot safely return home being left in state care for years, often moving from placement to placement, without genuine consideration of adoption? The recent Child Safety Inquiry has put that question squarely on the table. Its findings are confronting.… Read More »Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland sperm donor family limits explained

  Queensland’s new sperm donor family limits were meant to provide sensible safeguards for children conceived through donor treatment. Instead, Queensland Health has adopted an interpretation that appears to split a female same sex couple into two separate families. That position is difficult to reconcile with the law, common sense, and the lived reality of… Read More »Queensland sperm donor family limits explained

South Australia surrogacy agreements: are they unlawful?

South Australia takes a distinctly narrow approach to surrogacy agreements. The issue is not simply whether a proposed arrangement is altruistic, or whether everyone involved has acted with the best of intentions. Under the Surrogacy Act 2019 (SA), the first question is whether the arrangement falls into the category of a lawful surrogacy agreement. That… Read More »South Australia surrogacy agreements: are they unlawful?

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board