Groves’ wife sues for $77million

Groves’ wife sues for $77million

Dr Le Neave Groves, co-founder of ABC Learning Centres and former wife of Eddy Groves, is suing him for $44 million and all up is suing Eddy and a group of banks for $77 million, according to the Australian.

The claim is alleged to have arisen in part when her shares were sold at the time of the collapse in ABC’s shareprice. Dr Groves asserts that the sales were without her permission.

It is very rare for cases of this kind to appear in the public eye. There are four notable features about this claim:

  1. unlike most property claims against a former spouse, it’s not in the Family Court or the Federal Magistrates Court. This dispute is therefore not dealt with in secret because of s.121 of the Family Law Act, but very much in the public eye. It is rare for a claim to be brought between ex-spouses other than under the Family Law Act because of the real possibility that there may be an adjustment in any case afterwards under s.79 of the Family Law Act.
  2. because it’s in the Supreme Court presumably the basis of the claim is under common law or some statute, and not under s.79 of the Family Law Act. This case illustrates s.119 of the Family Law Act– husbands and wives can sue each other in contract or tort and are not limited to claims under the Family Law Act.
  3. the size of the claim. It’s for big bikkies.
  4. the number of parties. In reality because it is a commercial dispute involving a number of banks, the most appropriate jurisdiction would be a court that handles commercial disputes as its daily bread and butter- such as the Supreme Court, which is where the dispute is being handled, rather than a court that specialises in family (not primarily commercial) disputes, such as the Family Court.
Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Relocating with children: what Australian family law requires

Relocating after separation can be an entirely understandable decision. A parent may have a new job, family support, a new relationship, financial pressures or a desire to make a fresh start. But when children are involved, moving a considerable distance can have serious family law consequences. A relocation is not simply about where one parent… Read More »Relocating with children: what Australian family law requires

Australian citizenship surrogacy: Home Affairs wants more proof

Australian intended parents pursuing surrogacy overseas need to be ready for a growing paperwork burden when applying for Australian citizenship by descent. A birth certificate alone may no longer be enough. Recent applications indicate that the Department of Home Affairs is increasingly asking for detailed evidence of the surrogate’s pregnancy and birth records, alongside evidence… Read More »Australian citizenship surrogacy: Home Affairs wants more proof

Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland’s child protection system is facing an urgent and deeply troubling question: why are children who cannot safely return home being left in state care for years, often moving from placement to placement, without genuine consideration of adoption? The recent Child Safety Inquiry has put that question squarely on the table. Its findings are confronting.… Read More »Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board