High Court rejects “gay” man’s refugee status

High Court rejects “gay” man’s refugee status

A Pakistani man claiming to be gay has been rejected by the High Court as a refugee.

In the case, called Minister for Immigration v SZMDS, the man had been refused refugee status by the Refugee Review Tribunal. He appealed to the Federal Magistrates Court and lost. He then appealed to the Federal Court, which upheld his appeal. The Minister for Immigration appealed to the High Court.

It was common grounds that homosexual men were prosecuted in Pakistan. The issue was whether this man had discharged his evidentiary burden of proof to show that he was gay, and was rightly fearful of being prosecuted in Pakistan.

The Facts

  • 1991 – he married. He and his wife then had four children
  • 1995 – he moved to the UAE for work
  • 1998 – he returned to Pakistan
  • 2004 – he moved back to the UAE
  • October 2005 to July 2007 – he developed an attraction to other men
  • July 2006 – he commenced a gay relationship in the UAE
  • October 2006- he travelled to the UK
  • December 2006 – he returned to the UAE
  • May 2007- he returned to Pakistan
  • June 2007 – he left Pakistan
  • July 2007- he arrives in Australia
  • August 2007- he applies for a protection visa

Why he failed

When the matter had been before the Federal Court, that court had upheld the man’s appeal because it said that it could not comprehend the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. A majority of the High Court disagreed with the Federal Court’s approach, stating that there was a logical conclusion to the Tribunal’s reasoning, and in essence it was this:

  • his evidence was uncorroborated. In other words, he did not have any witnesses to back up his story.
  • the Tribunal didn’t believe him.
  • the man’s story was that he had engaged in gay sex in the UAE where gay sex was criminalised, both under the criminal law and Sharia law.
  • his fear of being persecuted in the UAE was not realistic.
  • if he were so afraid of being persecuted, he should have applied for a protection visa when he was in the UK. He didn’t.
  • if he were so afraid of being persecuted in Pakistan, he wouldn’t have returned there for 3 weeks in 2007.
Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

What really happens inside the world’s largest ethical surrogacy conference?

When reproductive law meets lived experience, the conversation shifts from theory to practice. At the Society for Ethical Egg Donation and Surrogacy (SEEDS) conference in Orange County, California, nearly 400 professionals came together to do exactly that: talk candidly about how to make surrogacy and egg donation safer, fairer and ethically robust. The gathering offered… Read More »What really happens inside the world’s largest ethical surrogacy conference?

Another US Surrogacy Agency Has Collapsed – Are Your Dreams at Risk?

A recent collapse of a United States surrogacy agency has again exposed a harsh reality for intended parents: the path to building a family through surrogacy is vulnerable to fraud, mismanagement and sudden collapse. Hundreds of people are reported to be affected, with life savings wiped out, records shredded and law enforcement stepping in. This… Read More »Another US Surrogacy Agency Has Collapsed – Are Your Dreams at Risk?

Update on surrogacy in the Mexican state of Jalisco

The current state of surrogacy regulation in the Mexican state of Jalisco is in a state of transition, according to attorney Ivan Davydov from Carem. I have set out below his recent summary sent out to clients, which I share with his permission. ——– Surrogacy in Jalisco Smart Move or Risky Timing Dear Clients, In… Read More »Update on surrogacy in the Mexican state of Jalisco

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board