I’m sorry, Shan Ju Lin, I don’t want to be treated like a patient

I’m sorry, Shan Ju Lin, I don’t want to be treated like a patient

About 40 or so years ago, the routine treatment for gays in the army in Australia, besides dishonourable discharge, was to ensure that they received psychiatric treatment, which included being held in custody, then electric shock treatment, so that their brains would be zapped, and they would no longer have the impulse of being attracted to other men. This was the era when sex between men was illegal and could be career ending. Another era- and one that we don’t want to bring back.

These days we are more enlightened. Back when Paul Keating was in power, after Australia got a drubbing at the United Nations because Tasmania still had the offence on the books of sodomy between men, the Commonwealth Parliament passed laws to make it a human right that those having sex in private were entitled to just that= privacy and not to be prosecuted.

Despite this history, in wades then One Nation candidate Shan Ju Lin who said on Facebook that “gays should be treated as patients”. I am glad that One Nation dumped her.

I have asthma and have had it all my life. I am happy to be treated in hospital for my asthma and other ailments, but not for my sexual orientation.  I don’t want either me or anyone like me to be treated like a patient- based on our sexuality,  dragged back 40 years, deemed mentally unwell, prevented from undertaking our jobs, demonised, being detained in a psych ward, and then having my brain zapped. Such a concept is abhorrent.

As then US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton told the UN in Geneva six years ago: “Gay rights are human rights.”

Or to put it the way Thomas Jefferson put it over 200 years ago: “All men are created equal.” Anything less than that is not good enough.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Cheap Surrogacy in Armenia? The Hidden Legal Traps You Must Know

Surrogacy in Armenia may look attractive at first glance. The price point is lower than many other international programs, and Armenia does have a legal framework permitting surrogacy. But low cost is not the same thing as low risk. For intended parents, especially Australians, this is one of those jurisdictions that demands very careful scrutiny… Read More »Cheap Surrogacy in Armenia? The Hidden Legal Traps You Must Know

ALRC Surrogacy Inquiry: What the Proposed Reforms Could Mean for Australians

Stephen Page Joins Final ALRC Advisory Committee Meeting on Surrogacy Law Reform Our Legal Practice Director, Stephen Page, recently took part in the third and final meeting of the Advisory Committee to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) surrogacy inquiry. The ALRC is due to report to the federal government by 29 July. This is… Read More »ALRC Surrogacy Inquiry: What the Proposed Reforms Could Mean for Australians

No Laws, High Risks: The Truth About Albanian Surrogacy

Albanian surrogacy is the kind of topic that should make intended parents stop and think very carefully before doing anything at all. When a country has no clear surrogacy framework, no proper safeguards, and no settled legal pathway for parentage, the risks do not sit at the edges. They sit right at the centre. At… Read More »No Laws, High Risks: The Truth About Albanian Surrogacy

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board