Lambda Legal Urges President to Eliminate US Travel Restrictions for People Living with HIV

Lambda Legal Urges President to Eliminate US Travel Restrictions for People Living with HIV

Comment: It is an absolute anachronism that the US continues to have laws to prevent HIV positive people being able to travel there.

Here is a media release by a leading US group of gay and lesbian lawyers, Lambda Legal, calling for change.

‘The ban against HIV-positive travelers and visitors is a violation of basic human rights, and the reversal of this discriminatory policy is long overdue.’
In a letter submitted today, Lambda Legal urges President Bush to end the ban on visitors and immigrants who are HIV positive by signing the President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) reauthorization bill.

Lambda Legal’s letter calls on the President to sign a bill repealing the statutory requirement that HIV be included on the list of diseases or conditions that make a person inadmissible to the United States. In addition, the letter urges the President then to direct the Department of Health and Human Services to use its restored regulatory authority and remove HIV from that list.

“The ban makes absolutely no sense given what we know about HIV,” said Scott Schoettes, HIV Staff Attorney at Lambda Legal. “The dismantling of this blatantly discriminatory policy is long overdue.”

Excerpt from letter signed by Lambda Legal Executive Director Kevin Cathcart:

“Since 1987, a time when HIV was relatively poorly understood, our government has prevented people living with HIV from entering the U.S. as visitors or immigrants by including HIV infection on the list of diseases that render a person inadmissible. In the early 1990’s, however, relying upon the advice of public health experts, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) sought to end that ban. Given the limited methods by which HIV can be transmitted, HHS recognized that concerns about public health simply did not warrant preventing people living with HIV from entering or residing in this country. Unfortunately, despite the sound scientific and medical basis for this intended change in policy, Congress reacted to HHS’s plans by codifying the ban against visitors and immigrants with HIV.

“As amended by Congress, the Immigration and Nationality Act requires HHS to include infection with HIV (the only disease or condition specified in the statute) on the list of diseases that serve as a basis for inadmissibility, regardless of the Secretary of HHS’s considered opinion as to the need to do so. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182. As a result of inclusion on this list, people living with HIV are ineligible to receive a visa to enter the U.S. – whether for vacation, employment, to attend a conference or for any other reason – and are ineligible to obtain lawful permanent resident status. Although waivers of this ban are available if specified conditions are met, those conditions are very restrictive and extremely difficult to satisfy.

“The ban against HIV-positive travelers and visitors is a violation of basic human rights, and the reversal of this discriminatory policy is long overdue. The HIV ban is based on prejudice and unwarranted fears, not on medical knowledge and sound public health principles. Continuing the ban fosters misunderstanding by the American public about HIV transmission; fuels bias, stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV in this country; and alienates people across the globe — including medical professionals, scientific experts and various others who are among those leading the fight against this pandemic.

“At long last, Congress has done its part to get rid of this ban. Section 305 of the PEPFAR reauthorization bill repeals the statutory language requiring HHS to include HIV on the list of diseases that make a person inadmissible to the U.S., thus returning to HHS the authority to make a determination based on medical knowledge and sound public health principles. By including this provision in the bill, Congress has finally recognized that the entry bar against individuals living with HIV is an unjustifiable infringement of basic human rights not in keeping with the traditions of this country, the principles on which it was founded or the role we want to play in the global fight against HIV and AIDS.

“The power now rests with you and your administration to complete the process of dismantling this ill-advised, unfair and anachronistic policy. Lambda Legal urges you to sign this bill into law. Moreover, we urge you to immediately direct the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to begin the process of removing HIV from the list of diseases that serve as grounds for inadmissibility. Not only is this the medically and scientifically correct thing to do, it is the right thing to do.

The bill is Tom Lantos and Henry J. Hyde U.S. Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria reauthorization Act of 2008 (S. 2731)

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

What You Need to Know About Adoption in Australia

In this video, Award-Winning surrogacy lawyer and Accredited Family Law Specialist, Stephen Page reveals the key things that you need to know regarding adoption in Australia.

Same Sex Couples & Adoption in Australia

In this video, Award-Winning surrogacy lawyer and Accredited Family Law Specialist, Stephen Page covers the essential legal steps for same-sex couples adopting in Australia.

The Pope’s cruel take on surrogacy

“I’m beautiful in my way ’cause God makes no mistakes I’m on the right track, baby, I was born this way” Lady Gaga I am outraged at the steps by the Pope’s call to stop surrogacy and be critical of LGBTQIA+ people.  It is no surprise, but it still saddens me. On Monday 8 April… Read More »The Pope’s cruel take on surrogacy

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board