New case: variation of overseas child maintenance order

In Klein and Wright the Federal Magistrates Court varied an overseas child maintenance order (which had been made in California). The grounds for variation were:   -the original agreement/order entered into on 13 November 2000 was entered into when the father’s income was $390,000 per annum (the US$ equivalent of $A714,628). The applicant earned $218,750… Read More »Custom Single Post Header

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board

New case: variation of overseas child maintenance order

In Klein and Wright the Federal Magistrates Court varied an overseas child maintenance order (which had been made in California). The grounds for variation were:

 

-the original agreement/order entered into on 13 November 2000 was entered into when the father’s income was $390,000 per annum (the US$ equivalent of $A714,628). The applicant earned $218,750 in the last financial year, hence his income is substantially reduced;

-the children at the time the agreement was entered into were living with their mother for the majority of their time. The agreement provided for the maintenance of three children, Z, D and G and the husband’s employer paid private school fees;
-at that time all the parties were residing in Italy.
-it is not in dispute that in the relevant period, namely throughout 2006 and 2007, the children have lived the majority of their time with their father. It is also not contested that Z has graduated from high school at the end of 2004 and has been self-supporting since November 2004. It is also not in dispute that the father has re-partnered and has an obligation to support his current wife. The father, rather than his employer, now meets the children’s school fees and they are $346 per week or $18,000 per annum.
-the parties themselves by their agreement in 2003 saw the need to review the child support arrangements with respect to the children. Much has changed since the original orders were made in 2000 including, in particular, the living arrangements that then existed for the children.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Forced Marriage

On November 1st 2023, Accredited Family Law Specialist and Page Provan Director Stephen Page presented a paper at the Brisbane Zonta Club about forced marriage. I acknowledge the Jagera and Turrbal peoples, on whose lands we meet today, their elders, past, present and emerging. Ruqia Hidari was aged 21 and living in Victoria, when, according to police,… Read More »Forced Marriage

ACT Government Surrogacy Bill

The ACT Government has today introduced a bill to amend the ACT’s surrogacy laws. The proposed changes are more incremental than fundamental. They include allowing a single person to undertake surrogacy, for the surrogate to be single if needed, a requirement for legal advice and counselling beforehand, a written agreement being required, that traditional surrogacy is… Read More »ACT Government Surrogacy Bill

Planning to resolve: ADR in ART

ADR can help resolve disputes in ART cases. ADR is not limited to mediation and arbitration. Other types of informal dispute resolution can resolve disputes. When assisted reproductive treatment cases go off the rails, they can have the next level of bitterness and volatility. There can be a keen sense of betrayal when things don’t… Read More »Planning to resolve: ADR in ART