NSW government rejects same sex adoption: overturns committee report

NSW government rejects same sex adoption: overturns committee report

“It is axiomatic in government that hornets’ nests should be left unstirred, cans of worms should remain unopened, and cats should be left firmly in bags and not set among the pigeons. Ministers should also leave boats unrocked, nettles ungrasped, refrain from taking bulls by the horns, and resolutely turn their backs to the music.”

I dropped in this quote from the master of do-nothing, Sir Humphrey Appleby from TV’s Yes Minister, as it demonstrates the approach by the NSW government to same sex adoption. NSW Minister Linda Burney  has been quoted as saying that the government decided not to change the law to include same sex adoption as it was “too complex” and “sensitive” and that there would need to be “more discussion”. In the process the government has rejected the approach of a parliamentary committee which recommended the changes.

In other words, the NSW Labor government proposes that the changes do not occur- to quote Sir Humphrey again: “in the fullness of time”, “at the appropriate juncture”.

The decision has meant, inevitably, that there it a hotch potch of laws concerning adoption in Australia. Same sex adoptions can occur in WA and Victoria, and in limited circumstances in Tasmania, but not elsewhere. As a result, there have been inevitable calls for national, uniform laws to allow same sex adoption.

Back in May, Fairfax was reporting that the NSW government was not going to support same sex adoption, in order to keep the support of Fred Nile in the Upper House. Rev. Fred Nile was one of those instrumental in opposing the original marchers for LGBT equal rights in NSW that morphed into the mardi gras.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

US Birthright Citizenship Challenge: What It Means for Australian Surrogacy Parents

The US Supreme Court has just heard one of the most consequential cases for international surrogacy in decades—and if you’re an Australian intended parent pursuing surrogacy in the United States, this directly affects you. Stephen Page, Director at Page Provan Family & Fertility Lawyers, breaks down what happened at the Supreme Court hearing in March… Read More »US Birthright Citizenship Challenge: What It Means for Australian Surrogacy Parents

WA Surrogacy Law Update: Nobody Knows When it Starts

If you’ve been waiting for Western Australia’s new surrogacy and fertility laws to take effect, you’re not alone—and the honest answer right now is: nobody knows exactly when they will. In this short update, Stephen Page, Director at Page Provan Family & Fertility Lawyers, breaks down where things stand with Western Australia’s Assisted Reproductive Technology… Read More »WA Surrogacy Law Update: Nobody Knows When it Starts

Pride is in the Air: When Pride Met Purpose

Sometimes a moment lands in a way that feels more than coincidental. For Stephen Page, Director at Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers, that happened on a Sunday in March after speaking at the Growing Families Conference in Melbourne. The conference focused on surrogacy and donation, the two pillars of modern family building for many… Read More »Pride is in the Air: When Pride Met Purpose

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board