Protection orders for pets?

Protection orders for pets?

Following the last post, I came across a post by Daniel Clement in New York, commenting on a New York Times article:

Now, there is a trend to issue orders of protection in favor of pets. The New York Times reported that in one case in Connecticut, a golden retriever was granted an order of protection against one half of a divorcing couple.

As the police tell it, Cassandra Reynolds pulled up in the driveway of her ex-husband’s home in South Windsor to pick up a few belongings.

A dispute ensued. Her ex-husband’s golden retriever approached her, so she kicked it, the police said. The dog yelped. Ms. Reynolds was arrested.

That was on Sept. 23. The next day, a Superior Court judge ordered Ms. Reynolds, 39, to stay away from her ex-husband and his new wife. The judge also ordered her to stay at least 100 yards away from Riley, the golden retriever — or face up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000.

Not surprisingly, pets, like people, are victims of domestic violence. According to the Times, there is legislation pending in other states, including New York, to allow courts to issue orders of protection in favor of animals. While this may be a noble and even necessary measure, I wonder if there is better way to accomplish the same goal.

As one police officer pointed out, “In a dispute, people tend to fixate on things they know will harm the other person.” Let me preface, my next statement, by saying I am a dog lover and owner. That said, is the case of directing anger against the dog in the incident described in the Times article, much different from smashing the windshield of the spouses car? Aren’t both acts really just displaced anger designed to hurt or terrorize the spouse?

Wouldn’t a better solution be to read and write orders of protection issued in cases of domestic violence broadly to protect both the person and the property of the person? Isn’t the symbolic act of violence directed to the property or pets of a person a threat which should be included in any protective order?

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Parental Child Abduction: What to Do if Your Child is Not Returned

International child abduction is one of the most distressing situations a parent can face. It often begins suddenly. A child is taken overseas without permission, or a parent agrees to overseas travel and then discovers the child is not being brought back. What sounds like a private family dispute can quickly become a complicated international… Read More »Parental Child Abduction: What to Do if Your Child is Not Returned

Cheap Surrogacy in Armenia? The Hidden Legal Traps You Must Know

Surrogacy in Armenia may look attractive at first glance. The price point is lower than many other international programs, and Armenia does have a legal framework permitting surrogacy. But low cost is not the same thing as low risk. For intended parents, especially Australians, this is one of those jurisdictions that demands very careful scrutiny… Read More »Cheap Surrogacy in Armenia? The Hidden Legal Traps You Must Know

ALRC Surrogacy Inquiry: What the Proposed Reforms Could Mean for Australians

Stephen Page Joins Final ALRC Advisory Committee Meeting on Surrogacy Law Reform Our Legal Practice Director, Stephen Page, recently took part in the third and final meeting of the Advisory Committee to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) surrogacy inquiry. The ALRC is due to report to the federal government by 29 July. This is… Read More »ALRC Surrogacy Inquiry: What the Proposed Reforms Could Mean for Australians

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board