Qld: Reintroduction of discriminatory Adoption Bill

Qld: Reintroduction of discriminatory Adoption Bill

The Bligh Government has reintroduced the discriminatory Adoption Bill to State Parliament. The Bill had been introduced before the last election, but not having passed, lapsed because of the election. The previous minister Margaret Keech described the earlier Bill as “world leading”.
The new Bill is in the same terms.

The Bill discriminates against same sex couples. It provides that the Anti-Discrimination Act is not to apply, and also says that adopters can be married or de facto couples who have been together for two years or more- but couples have to be heterosexual. The Bill says that a prospective adoptive parent must have a spouse of 2 years or more who “is not the same gender as the person.”

Child Safety Minister Phil Reeves said that the Bill, “which reflects contemporary community standards”, “comprehensively reforms and modernises Queensland’s 40 year old adoption laws”.

“Another important and contemporary reform introduced by the Bligh government is that eligibility to lodge expressions of interest will no longer be limited to married couples. Instead, eligibility will be opened up to de facto couples who have been in a committed relationship for at least two years,” Mr Reeves said.

Neither Phil Reeves nor Margaret Keech have been silent about the bill discriminating against same sex couples.

There has been no explanation as to why the Bill discriminates.

There has been no explanation as to how “contemporary community standards” are different in Queensland compared to those places where there is no discrimination.

As to the comments about how progressive Queensland is, these States and Territories do not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation:

  • ACT (1993)
  • Western Australia (1994)
  • Tasmania (1988)

These States and Territories discriminate against same sex adoptions:

  • New South Wales (2000)
  • Victoria (1984)
  • Queensland (1964)
  • South Australia (1988)
  • Northern Territory (n/k)
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Australia’s Surrogacy System is Broken — Here’s What Needs to Change

Surrogacy in Australia is at a critical crossroads. Families are increasingly forced to look overseas to start or grow their families, surrogates often find themselves without clear legal protections, and children born through surrogacy face a tangled web of legal uncertainty.

Surrogacy Nightmare: Aussie Couple Referred for Criminal Charges After Overseas Baby Journey

Surrogacy can be a beautiful path to parenthood, but it also comes with intricate legal challenges, especially when undertaken overseas. In a recent and cautionary case from Queensland, Australia, a couple’s journey to parenthood through commercial surrogacy in North Cyprus ended not with joy alone, but with legal turmoil and potential criminal charges.

NSW Surrogacy FAIL: What Lawyers Got Wrong and How to Avoid It

Surrogacy journeys should be joyous and smooth pathways to parenthood, but unfortunately, legal missteps can turn them into complex, frustrating ordeals.

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board