Remember to make offers: NSW case

When property settlement proceedings are under way, most people make offers to settle because: if you can settle a matter, save a bundle on legal fees and get out- you are ahead; if you make an offer and do better than the offer at trial, then you might be able to get an order for… Read More »Custom Single Post Header

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board

Remember to make offers: NSW case

When property settlement proceedings are under way, most people make offers to settle because:

  • if you can settle a matter, save a bundle on legal fees and get out- you are ahead;
  • if you make an offer and do better than the offer at trial, then you might be able to get an order for costs in your favour, which should reduce some of the costs that you would otherwise have to pay.

There is then an incentive both to make offers to settle, and to consider very carefully any offers that are made.

In the recent New South Wales District Court case of Henriques v Fernandez, the court was considering a property settlement application under the Property Relationships Act. The court made an order in favour of the former de facto wife, the plaintiff. District Court Judge Johnstone held:

In this case it is evident that this plaintiff was required to commence these
proceedings to enforce her entitlement in respect of a division of the
assets. It is clear from the evidence before me, and from what I am told
from the bar table, which I accept, that at no time did the defendant
concede any entitlement on the part of this plaintiff to anything. The
evidence to the contrary is overwhelming and for those reasons it is
appropriate that this plaintiff be awarded costs. Indeed, had there been an offer of compromise, or a Calderbank letter I would have awarded indemnity costs. However, there is not.

(emphasis added)

In other words, if the plaintiff had made an offer to settle, she may have received substantially more in costs than she did.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Forced Marriage

On November 1st 2023, Accredited Family Law Specialist and Page Provan Director Stephen Page presented a paper at the Brisbane Zonta Club about forced marriage. I acknowledge the Jagera and Turrbal peoples, on whose lands we meet today, their elders, past, present and emerging. Ruqia Hidari was aged 21 and living in Victoria, when, according to police,… Read More »Forced Marriage

ACT Government Surrogacy Bill

The ACT Government has today introduced a bill to amend the ACT’s surrogacy laws. The proposed changes are more incremental than fundamental. They include allowing a single person to undertake surrogacy, for the surrogate to be single if needed, a requirement for legal advice and counselling beforehand, a written agreement being required, that traditional surrogacy is… Read More »ACT Government Surrogacy Bill

Planning to resolve: ADR in ART

ADR can help resolve disputes in ART cases. ADR is not limited to mediation and arbitration. Other types of informal dispute resolution can resolve disputes. When assisted reproductive treatment cases go off the rails, they can have the next level of bitterness and volatility. There can be a keen sense of betrayal when things don’t… Read More »Planning to resolve: ADR in ART