Rudd to remove same sex discrimination (except marriage)

Rudd to remove same sex discrimination (except marriage)

The Rudd Government announced yesterday that it would introduce bills into Parliament by June so that 100 pieces of legislation would be amended to remove discrimination against same sex couples.

This will matters such as public servants’ pensions, defence force entitlements, Medicare, Centrelink and tax matters.

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland said that some changes would take place immediately, but others would not occur until mid next year, to allow people (and the Government) time to adjust their arrangements, as there would be winners and losers. He was quite clear to identify that whilst gay and lesbian couples are now not treated as a couple for Centrelink benefits, they will be after the changes come into force.

There has been criticism of the Government for its refusal to allow amendments to the Marriage Act to allow same sex marriages, and the Government is still refusing to allow the ACT to permit civil unions as they “mimic” marriages, although there is to be a meeting between the Governments about the ACT proposal tomorrow.

Whilst the peak lawyers body, the Law Council of Australia approved the changes, it called for the changes to the Marriage Act to be made: “As long as the Government remains intent on preserving a special class of state-sanctioned relationship which is closed to same-sex couples, discrimination will persist,” President Ross Ray QC said.

“And it will persist regardless of whether or not any Government entitlements are exclusively available to couples within that limited class.”

He said the Law Council would continue to advocate for reform in this area.

“In the end, it’s simple – all people are equal before the law and should be entitled to the same fundamental rights.”

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Relocating with children: what Australian family law requires

Relocating after separation can be an entirely understandable decision. A parent may have a new job, family support, a new relationship, financial pressures or a desire to make a fresh start. But when children are involved, moving a considerable distance can have serious family law consequences. A relocation is not simply about where one parent… Read More »Relocating with children: what Australian family law requires

Australian citizenship surrogacy: Home Affairs wants more proof

Australian intended parents pursuing surrogacy overseas need to be ready for a growing paperwork burden when applying for Australian citizenship by descent. A birth certificate alone may no longer be enough. Recent applications indicate that the Department of Home Affairs is increasingly asking for detailed evidence of the surrogate’s pregnancy and birth records, alongside evidence… Read More »Australian citizenship surrogacy: Home Affairs wants more proof

Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Queensland’s child protection system is facing an urgent and deeply troubling question: why are children who cannot safely return home being left in state care for years, often moving from placement to placement, without genuine consideration of adoption? The recent Child Safety Inquiry has put that question squarely on the table. Its findings are confronting.… Read More »Why adoption has become “institutionally invisible” in Queensland

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board