Rudd to remove same sex discrimination (except marriage)

Rudd to remove same sex discrimination (except marriage)

The Rudd Government announced yesterday that it would introduce bills into Parliament by June so that 100 pieces of legislation would be amended to remove discrimination against same sex couples.

This will matters such as public servants’ pensions, defence force entitlements, Medicare, Centrelink and tax matters.

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland said that some changes would take place immediately, but others would not occur until mid next year, to allow people (and the Government) time to adjust their arrangements, as there would be winners and losers. He was quite clear to identify that whilst gay and lesbian couples are now not treated as a couple for Centrelink benefits, they will be after the changes come into force.

There has been criticism of the Government for its refusal to allow amendments to the Marriage Act to allow same sex marriages, and the Government is still refusing to allow the ACT to permit civil unions as they “mimic” marriages, although there is to be a meeting between the Governments about the ACT proposal tomorrow.

Whilst the peak lawyers body, the Law Council of Australia approved the changes, it called for the changes to the Marriage Act to be made: “As long as the Government remains intent on preserving a special class of state-sanctioned relationship which is closed to same-sex couples, discrimination will persist,” President Ross Ray QC said.

“And it will persist regardless of whether or not any Government entitlements are exclusively available to couples within that limited class.”

He said the Law Council would continue to advocate for reform in this area.

“In the end, it’s simple – all people are equal before the law and should be entitled to the same fundamental rights.”

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy Counseling: The Key Differences Between QLD and NSW

Surrogacy counselling is one of the most important parts of any surrogacy arrangement, and it is also one of the most commonly misunderstood. That confusion does not just affect intended parents and surrogates. It can also affect lawyers, counsellors, and other professionals involved in the process. The reason is fairly simple. Both Queensland and New… Read More »Surrogacy Counseling: The Key Differences Between QLD and NSW

Surrogacy in Vietnam: The Risks of the Black Market and Restrictive Laws

Surrogacy in Vietnam is legal, but only in a very narrow and tightly controlled way. That is the starting point, and it is the point many intended parents miss. Vietnam stands apart from a number of countries in Asia because it does have a legal framework for surrogacy. On paper, that sounds encouraging. In practice,… Read More »Surrogacy in Vietnam: The Risks of the Black Market and Restrictive Laws

Surrogacy in Cyprus: Understanding the North vs South Divide

Surrogacy in Cyprus sounds, at first glance, like it might offer a Mediterranean alternative for intended parents looking overseas. In reality, Cyprus is not one surrogacy destination but two very different legal and political environments sitting on the same island. That divide matters enormously. For Australians in particular, surrogacy in Cyprus raises serious practical, legal… Read More »Surrogacy in Cyprus: Understanding the North vs South Divide

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board