Terrible tale of surrogacy in the Ukraine

Terrible tale of surrogacy in the Ukraine

The former Chief Justice of the Family Court, John Pascoe, once described much of what happens in the world as to surrogacy as the wild West. This is the only conclusion that can be drawn from this case-set out in a Foreign Correspondent story to go to air tonight-  of an American couple who have not taken their child, Bridget, from the Ukraine. Bridget was born premature and is disabled.

What has happened to her is a disgrace.

At the centre of the story is Biotex.com, a Ukrainian surrogacy agency. Last year the Ukrainian Justice Minister accused that agency of fraud, a story I wrote about on this blog. Those who access surrogacy in the Ukraine must be heterosexual married couples, one of whom is genetically the parent of the child. According to the Justice Minister, Biotex.com told an Italian couple in 2011 that there was a genetic link to their child. A subsequent test undertaken in Italy last year said that there was no link.

Quite simply, those engage in child trafficking should face the full weight of the law. That’s what happened to California lawyer Theresa Erickson back in 2012. She had come up with a scheme that went like this: American intended parents wanted to have a child through surrogacy were told that, by sheer luck, the intended parents in another Ukrainian surrogacy agreement had pulled out, and that their baby would be born soon. In essence, babies were made to order. Theresa Erickson was jailed for trafficking as were her co-accused.

Renowned California surrogacy attorney Andy Vorzimer said this about Theresa Erickson’s scam:

“These were criminals that were creating human life for sale. Many people consider this to be a surrogacy arrangement gone awry. But this was not surrogacy in any shape or form. They attempted to create the most marketable baby available, which was blond hair, blue-eyed baby, while simultaneously pulling on the heart strings of intended parents. It defies description the immorality that was involved in this ongoing operation that went on for years.”

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

In Surrogacy, Always Have a Back-Up Plan

Australians pursuing international surrogacy should always have a contingency plan. This article explains why planning is essential, outlines the real risks families face when surrogacy crosses borders, and provides a practical checklist to protect children from becoming stateless or stranded. Why a back-up plan matters When people think about international surrogacy they often imagine a… Read More »In Surrogacy, Always Have a Back-Up Plan

How to Minimise the Cost of Separation & Divorce

Separation can quickly become an expensive, emotionally draining process, or it can be managed in a way that protects dignity, finances, and the best interests of the children. This article offers practical, experience-driven advice on minimising both the financial and emotional costs of separation and divorce. Why separation becomes costly, and how it usually doesn’t… Read More »How to Minimise the Cost of Separation & Divorce

Criminalising Overseas Surrogacy: Why Ireland, Italy, and Queensland’s “Experiment” Will Fail

Jurisdictions tend to respond to overseas commercial surrogacy by criminalising their own residents for seeking surrogacy abroad. That experiment began in Queensland in 1988 and has since been copied in other places, most recently, Ireland and Italy. After watching how this played out in Australia and abroad, I want to explain plainly why criminalising overseas… Read More »Criminalising Overseas Surrogacy: Why Ireland, Italy, and Queensland’s “Experiment” Will Fail

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board