Thai surrogacy is now dead in the water

Thai surrogacy is now dead in the water

A couple of days ago I wrote about how there was a crackdown in Thailand about surrogacy and gender selection.

Yesterday there was a meeting between the various IVF clinics, the Thai Medical Council, lawyers and others. The outcome of the meeting is ominous for those who undertake surrogacy in Thailand: it is over.

In summary, surrogacy is now only recognised in Thailand if:

  • the intended parents are a heterosexual married couple
  • who are medically infertile
  • the surrogacy is altruistic
  • and the surrogate is a blood relative.

It is no surprise that this will exclude almost every foreigner from pursuing surrogacy in Thailand. For Australians, this is significant- as about 400 babies were born in Thailand via surrogacy in the year ended 30 June 2012 to Aussie intended parents, and that number is likely to have increased since then.

The ruling coming out of the meeting, bearing in mind that there is now a military junta in charge in Thailand, is that surrogacy will be illegal in Thailand if:

  • the intended parent or parents are unmarried under Thai law (i.e. de facto couples, same sex couples and singles are excluded)
  • any money is paid to the surrogate
  • the removal of the child from Thailand without permission of Thai authorities will breach Thailand’s human trafficking laws.

What impact this will have on those with existing arrangements, and those with embryos in Thailand, will remain to be seen. It is likely that those with embryos in Thailand- where they have donor sperm or egg- will be unlikely to use those embryos in Australia, and if they want to be used may need to use them somewhere else, such as the USA. Whether embryos will be able to be exported from Thailand is unknown in the current environment.

Watch this space. 

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

NSW surrogacy law is not extra-territorial: judge

It is depressing to read a judgment and realise that a judge has got something fairly basic wrong. It is even more depressing, as a family lawyer of 38 years post-admission, to see a judgment where the judge got two significant issues of law wrong in the judgment. Sadly, that occurred in the case of… Read More »NSW surrogacy law is not extra-territorial: judge

Queensland couple referred to police for surrogacy

A Queensland husband and wife, in the recent case of  Lloyd & Compton [2025] FedCFamC1A 28,  who had undertaken surrogacy in North Cyprus, were denied their chance of parenting orders and leave to adopt because they had undertaken commercial surrogacy. Instead, they were referred to the Queensland Director of Public Prosecutions for engaging in commercial… Read More »Queensland couple referred to police for surrogacy

The Disclosure Requirements in Family Law

In this video, solicitor Ella Leitch outlines the disclosure obligations every separating person must understand. For anyone engaging with family lawyers, the message is clear: transparency is essential. Failure to disclose relevant documents can lead to severe procedural and even criminal consequences, derail property settlements, and damage parenting matters. This article summarises the key legal… Read More »The Disclosure Requirements in Family Law

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board