US: Lesbian entitled to see children

US: Lesbian entitled to see children

In a recent decision of the Montana Supreme Court in Kulstad v Maniaci, Ms Kulstad and Ms Maniaci had been together for about 10 years before they split up.

During the course of their relationship, Ms Maniaci had adopted two children. Ms Kulstad wanted to be involved in their care and to see them. Ms Maniaci sought that she not do so, asserting that as she was the only legal parent that Ms Kulstad had no right to be involved.

It appeared that the evidence was that despite Ms Maniaci’s efforts post-separation, the children were bonded well to Ms Kulstad. Ms Kulstad had not been able to adopt the children because Montana law prohibited same sex adoptions.

The court held that Ms Kulstad could continue to have contact with the children as she had performed the role of a de facto parent, and that she would be jointly responsible for parenting decisions for the children.

For more about the case, click here.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy statistics: why so many go overseas

Surrogacy is intensely personal, but the numbers tell an important story about how difficult it can be for intended parents in Australia. The central statistic is striking: for every child born in Australia through surrogacy, about four are born overseas. That is not a small difference. It points to a system in which many intended… Read More »Surrogacy statistics: why so many go overseas

How much does surrogacy really cost? A ballpark figure

Surrogacy is not simply a medical process. It is a legal, emotional, practical and financial journey. One of the first questions intended parents rightly ask is: how much is this going to cost? The honest answer is that it depends on where the journey takes place, whether an egg donor is needed, the legal requirements… Read More »How much does surrogacy really cost? A ballpark figure

How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

When parents cannot agree about arrangements for their children, the central question for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is not what either parent wants. It is what arrangements are in the best interests of the child. This is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act 1975. It applies whenever a judge… Read More »How the family court decides parenting cases: the best interests test explained

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board