Using Facebook can breach no contact orders

Using Facebook can breach no contact orders

It is common when domestic violence orders are made that an order that can be made is for the respondent not to have any contact with the aggrieved.

Some Magistrates used to copy the Bail Act provisions when they made these:

No contact, direct or indirect, whether personal or otherwise

;

while more recntly clauses have said: “no contact, including by phone or electronic means”.

Well two men, one in the US and one in the UK have been punished for breaching no contact clauses by using Facebook.

In the UK case, the exhusband, who had engaged in a series of harassing emails and texts went to join Facebook. Whether deliberately or not, he allowed Facebook to request his ex-wife to be a friend. Result? A breach and 10 days jail.

In the US case, People v. Fernino 851 N.Y.S.2d 339 (N.Y.C. Crim.Ct., 2008), a protection order had been made against Melissa Fernino,which included: “Respondent shall have NO CONTACT with Sandra Delgrosso.”

Melissa Fernino then made friend requests on Facebook to Sandra Delgrosso and her two daughters.

The court found that the friend request was a breach. While it was true that a person can deny the request to become friends, that request was still a contact, which violated the no contact requirement of the protection order.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How Are Debts Divided in Divorce? Australian Property Settlement Explained

When people separate, one of the most common questions is also one of the most misunderstood: what happens to the debts? Many people assume there must be a simple rule. Half each. Joint debts are shared. Personal debts stay personal. In Australian family law, it is not that straightforward. In a property settlement, debts are… Read More »How Are Debts Divided in Divorce? Australian Property Settlement Explained

Hague Surrogacy Convention Paused After 15 Years — What Went Wrong

After 15 years of work, the Hague Conference on Private International Law has paused its long-running project to create an international convention dealing with surrogacy and legal parentage. That is a significant development for anyone involved in cross-border surrogacy, assisted reproductive treatment, and international family law. The pause matters because international surrogacy does not stop… Read More »Hague Surrogacy Convention Paused After 15 Years — What Went Wrong

One Sperm Donor, 550 Children: Why Australia Needs Urgent Regulation

Private sperm donation is often marketed as simple, accessible and modern. In reality, it can create legal, ethical and deeply human problems on a staggering scale. Two recent overseas stories show exactly what can happen when sperm donation is left largely unchecked. In one case, a mother believed her child was the only child conceived… Read More »One Sperm Donor, 550 Children: Why Australia Needs Urgent Regulation

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board