Using Facebook can breach no contact orders

Using Facebook can breach no contact orders

It is common when domestic violence orders are made that an order that can be made is for the respondent not to have any contact with the aggrieved.

Some Magistrates used to copy the Bail Act provisions when they made these:

No contact, direct or indirect, whether personal or otherwise

;

while more recntly clauses have said: “no contact, including by phone or electronic means”.

Well two men, one in the US and one in the UK have been punished for breaching no contact clauses by using Facebook.

In the UK case, the exhusband, who had engaged in a series of harassing emails and texts went to join Facebook. Whether deliberately or not, he allowed Facebook to request his ex-wife to be a friend. Result? A breach and 10 days jail.

In the US case, People v. Fernino 851 N.Y.S.2d 339 (N.Y.C. Crim.Ct., 2008), a protection order had been made against Melissa Fernino,which included: “Respondent shall have NO CONTACT with Sandra Delgrosso.”

Melissa Fernino then made friend requests on Facebook to Sandra Delgrosso and her two daughters.

The court found that the friend request was a breach. While it was true that a person can deny the request to become friends, that request was still a contact, which violated the no contact requirement of the protection order.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

ART Update from Australia: Stephen Page Presents at South African Family Law Conference

On 11–13 March 2026, Stephen Page, Director at Page Provan Family and Fertility Lawyers, presented remotely at the prestigious 28th Annual MDT/UWC Global Family Law Conference in Cape Town, South Africa. As Australia’s leading surrogacy lawyer and an Accredited Family Law Specialist since 1996, Stephen delivered “ART Update from Australia”—a comprehensive overview of Australia’s evolving… Read More »ART Update from Australia: Stephen Page Presents at South African Family Law Conference

3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

When intended parents consider international surrogacy, the legal and ethical landscape can be treacherous. One government has taken a blunt but pragmatic approach: rather than issuing a blanket prohibition on overseas commercial surrogacy, it has published a short list of specific countries where surrogacy arrangements will almost certainly jeopardise a child’s legal status. That list… Read More »3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Representing yourself in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is increasingly common. Cost pressures, the perceived simplicity of some disputes and a desire to stay hands-on drive many people to act without a lawyer. That can work in certain circumstances, but there are important legal and practical limits to be aware of —… Read More »Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board