Using Facebook can breach no contact orders

Using Facebook can breach no contact orders

It is common when domestic violence orders are made that an order that can be made is for the respondent not to have any contact with the aggrieved.

Some Magistrates used to copy the Bail Act provisions when they made these:

No contact, direct or indirect, whether personal or otherwise

;

while more recntly clauses have said: “no contact, including by phone or electronic means”.

Well two men, one in the US and one in the UK have been punished for breaching no contact clauses by using Facebook.

In the UK case, the exhusband, who had engaged in a series of harassing emails and texts went to join Facebook. Whether deliberately or not, he allowed Facebook to request his ex-wife to be a friend. Result? A breach and 10 days jail.

In the US case, People v. Fernino 851 N.Y.S.2d 339 (N.Y.C. Crim.Ct., 2008), a protection order had been made against Melissa Fernino,which included: “Respondent shall have NO CONTACT with Sandra Delgrosso.”

Melissa Fernino then made friend requests on Facebook to Sandra Delgrosso and her two daughters.

The court found that the friend request was a breach. While it was true that a person can deny the request to become friends, that request was still a contact, which violated the no contact requirement of the protection order.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

30 Years a Specialist & 21 Years Together: The Page Provan Story

Some anniversaries arrive with fanfare. Others sneak up quietly and then suddenly feel enormous. At the end of June and the beginning of July 2026, two milestones sit side by side. One marks 30 years as an accredited family law specialist. The other marks 21 years working alongside Bruce Provan. Together, they say something important… Read More »30 Years a Specialist & 21 Years Together: The Page Provan Story

Australian Surrogacy Law: A Gay Father’s Journey from Prejudice to Pride

Pride Month means different things to different people. For some, it is celebration. For others, it is remembrance, protest, relief, or the simple comfort of being seen. For LGBTQIA+ parents in Australia, Pride can also carry a very specific weight. It can be about family, legal recognition, and the fight to ensure children are protected… Read More »Australian Surrogacy Law: A Gay Father’s Journey from Prejudice to Pride

Inside Australia’s Sperm Donor Crisis

Australia’s sperm donor shortage did not appear overnight. It is the product of law, policy and unintended consequences colliding at exactly the wrong time. The result is a system under enormous strain, where demand for donor sperm far exceeds supply, clinics are forced to turn people away, and desperate Australians are being pushed into private… Read More »Inside Australia’s Sperm Donor Crisis

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board