What an amazing week for equality- on three continents, and a step backwards

What an amazing week for equality- on three continents, and a step backwards

After the depressing news a couple of weeks ago that Kenya’s highest court has ruled that its laws making homosexual sex illegal were valid, there have been three amazing steps forward this week:

Balanced against these outcomes is the Vatican’s call that people are only male or female. The call “Male or female- He created them” does not recognise intersex or transgender people:

“The process of identifying sexual identity is made more difficult by the fictitious construct known as “gender neuter” or “third gender”, which has the effect of obscuring the fact that a person’s sex is a structural determinant of male or female identity. Efforts to go beyond the constitutive male-female sexual difference, such as the ideas of “intersex” or “transgender”, lead to a masculinity or feminity that is ambiguous, even though (in a self-contradictory way), these concepts themselves actually presuppose the very sexual difference that they propose to negate or supersede. This oscillation between male and female becomes, at the end of the day, only a ‘provocative’ display against so-called ‘traditional frameworks’, and one which, in fact, ignores the suffering of those who have to live situations of sexual indeterminacy. Similar theories aim to annihilate the concept of ‘nature’, (that is, everything we have been given as a pre-existing foundation of our being and action in the world), while at the same time implicitly reaffirming its existence.

And for anyone who cannot achieve naturally, the Vatican says:

“The physiological complementarity of male-female sexual difference assures the necessary conditions for procreation. In contrast, only recourse to reproductive technology can allow one of the partners in a relationship of two persons of the same sex to generate offspring, using ‘in vitro’ fertilization and a surrogate mother. However, the use of such technology is not a replacement for natural conception, since it involves the manipulation of human embryos, the fragmentation of parenthood, the instrumentalization and/or commercialization of the human body as well as the reduction of a baby to an object in the hands of science and technology.”

Or to put it another way, if you cannot conceive naturally, too bad, so sad. 

What an outrageous concept.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Monash IVF CEO Resignation After Another Embryo Mix-up

The fertility industry in Australia is facing a profound crisis, one that has shaken the very foundation of trust between hopeful parents and the clinics they rely on. With over 100,000 IVF cycles performed annually, the stakes could not be higher.

Your Voice Can Change Australia’s Surrogacy Laws Forever

Surrogacy is a journey filled with hope, challenges, and profound joy. As someone who has personally navigated this path, I understand the complexities and emotional highs that come with building a family through surrogacy.

Who Gets the Pet After a Breakup?

From the heart of Brisbane, where the Turbo and Jagura peoples have long called home, I’m Stephen Page from Page Provan, here to share an important update in Australian family law that affects many of us who love our furry companions.

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board