Friday, January 04, 2019
There was a 25% jump in the number of children born overseas via surrogacy compared to the previous year, according to official figures obtained by The Australian. The Department of Home Affairs figures show that in the 2017 – 2018 year 175 children were born overseas and obtained Australian citizenship by descent. This compares to the 2016 – 2017 year where only 139 children obtained citizenship by descent from overseas surrogacy arrangements.
That 2016 – 2017 figure was very low compared to previous years when in 2014 – 2015, 242 children obtained citizenship by descent through surrogacy overseas and in 2015 – 2016 the number was 2014.
It seems that the 2016 – 2017 figure was an anomaly.
Unlike previous years, the Department has not given a breakdown of the number of children born in each country, but merely given the top five countries where Australian children have been born:
The surprising country there is Thailand. I would speculate that it is unlikely that this is a hangover of babies born before the Baby Gammy saga occurred commencing in August 2014. You will remember the Baby Gammy saga. Mr and Mrs Farnell were a couple living in Bunbury who underwent surrogacy in Thailand. Mr Farnell was a convicted paedophile. At birth, Mr and Mrs Farnell took Baby Pipah, but not Baby Gammy, who remained in the care of the surrogate Mrs Chanbua in Thailand. The matter played out in the world’s media, partly resulting in a crackdown on surrogacy in Thailand, and then played out in the Family Court of Western Australia.
More likely the Thailand figure is for children born in Thailand where Australian intended parents have undertaken surrogacy somewhere else in Indochina, such as Cambodia and Laos. Cambodia cracked down on surrogacy in about October 2016. There were reports at the time that pregnant surrogates in Cambodia left the country to give birth elsewhere. One could well imagine that they may have travelled to Thailand, given birth there and subsequently the Australian intended parents obtained citizenship by descent for their children in Thailand.
The Department of Home Affairs figures do not show two categories of children born overseas via surrogacy:
· They only show children born to Australians who obtained Australian citizenship. There are a small number of children who live in Australia where their parents are visa holders (for example permanent residents of Australia) and therefore do not seek Australian citizenship by descent.
· The other category is the presumably small number of intended parents who are heterosexual couples who falsely claim a pregnancy overseas. I have seen several cases where those couples of been caught by the Department of Home Affairs. Presumably there are some couples who get away with it.
I would strongly urge anyone who undertakes surrogacy overseas to comply with the law and to make sure that when they deal with the Department of Home Affairs they do so truthfully. The figures demonstrate that the Department will properly process citizenship by descent applications. Their internal guidelines note that the test the departmental officers must follow is that contained in the Australian Citizenship Act, not State or Territory surrogacy legislation. Anyone in doubt should get competent legal advice about the issue.