Black Friday meant good luck for many children born through surrogacy – and their parents

Black Friday meant good luck for many children born through surrogacy – and their parents

Friday the 13th, Black Friday, is normally a day of doom and gloom- when things go wrong. However, Black Friday, 13 December 2024 was a good day for many children born through surrogacy – and their parents.

On that date, the Family Law Regulations 1984 (Cth) were replaced by the Family Law Regulations 2024 (Cth), the usual reaction to which would be a yawn.

However, a technical change in the new Regulations has meant that the parentage of many children born overseas through surrogacy has now been rendered certain.

Section 69R of the Family Law Act was long seen as a dead letter for children born overseas. It sets out that a person named on a birth certificate is presumed to be a parent of the child- if the birth certificate issued under an Australian state or territory law- or that of a prescribed overseas jurisdiction.  The problem was that no overseas jurisdiction was every prescribed.

Until 13th December 2024. On that day, many countries were prescribed. Therefore, when children have been born there and have a birth certificate issued there, the people named on the birth certificate as their parents are presumed to be their parents under Australian law. Many of these countries are where Australians have undertaken surrogacy:

Surrogacy destination

  • Brazil
  • Canada – all except Quebec
  • Colombia
  • Denmark
  • Greece
  • Guatemala
  • India
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • Ukraine
  • United Kingdom
  • United States of America

In my view, the changes apply to children born both before and after 13 December 2024.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

When intended parents consider international surrogacy, the legal and ethical landscape can be treacherous. One government has taken a blunt but pragmatic approach: rather than issuing a blanket prohibition on overseas commercial surrogacy, it has published a short list of specific countries where surrogacy arrangements will almost certainly jeopardise a child’s legal status. That list… Read More »3 Countries You Should Never Use for Surrogacy

Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

Representing yourself in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is increasingly common. Cost pressures, the perceived simplicity of some disputes and a desire to stay hands-on drive many people to act without a lawyer. That can work in certain circumstances, but there are important legal and practical limits to be aware of —… Read More »Self-Represented Litigant in Family Court Australia: What You NEED to Know First

My Surrogacy Reform Wish List for Australia

Australia’s surrogacy framework is fragmented, outdated and producing avoidable harm for intended parents, surrogates and, most importantly, children. A clearer, fairer and nationally consistent approach to surrogacy law reform would reduce cost, stress and legal uncertainty while better protecting human rights and minimising exploitation. Below is a practical wish list for reform that focuses on… Read More »My Surrogacy Reform Wish List for Australia

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board