Sperm is not taken, it is ejaculated…

Sperm is not taken, it is ejaculated…

Last week Ian Maynard, the Director General of Queensland Health wrote to Queensland IVF clinics. This is part of what he had to say:

“In Queensland, under section 41 of the Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1979 (the Act), it is an offence to advertise for the buying of (human) tissue or the right to take tissue from the bodies of persons, unless the proposed advertisement has been approved by the Minister and contains a statement to that effect.

ART providers wishing to advertise in Queensland therefore must comply with the Act by making a formal application for Ministerial approval. Should you or your staff wish to advertise in relation to gamete donation, you must make an application to do so, by submitting your proposed advertisement together with other relevant detail to my office for ministerial consideration.

All correct so far as it goes concerning egg donors- but sperm donors don’t need doctors to take the sperm from them- after they masturbate it leaves their bodies from ejaculation. As sperm does not need to be taken by doctors from the bodies of donors, therefore in my view clinics are free to advertise for sperm donors without the need for approval from Lawrence Springborg as Minister for Health.

This is what I wrote to the Minister last week:


16 May 2014

The Hon Lawrence Springborg MP

Minister for Health

By email:        health@minsterial.qld.gov.au

Dear Mr Springborg

Advertising for Egg and Sperm Donors by IVF Clinics

I am a surrogacy and family lawyer in Brisbane.  I am aware that a view has been expressed by Queensland Health that IVF clinics must obtain your approval under section 41 of the Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1979 to advertise seeking any gamete donations.

This view is, with respect incorrect as a matter of law.

Section 41 of the Act makes it an offence to advertise for the buying of human tissue or the right to take tissue from the bodies of persons unless the proposed advertisement has been approved by you as the Minister and contains a statement to that effect.

It is clear on a reading of that Act that tissue includes eggs and sperm.

The key phrase in the section is “the right to take tissue from the bodies of persons”.  Breaking down that phrase it is clear:

  • ·         In effect only doctors have the right to take tissue, therefore so far as intended parents are concerned, there is no prohibition on advertisements by intended parents seeking egg and sperm donors;

  • ·         Tissue includes eggs and sperm;

  • ·         There is a requirement to take tissue from the bodies of persons.

Therefore, with the comparative exception of men who have undertaken vasectomy there is on its face a requirement to obtain Ministerial approval for egg donors but there is not a requirement to obtain ministerial approval for advertising for sperm donors.  To put it bluntly, sperm is ejaculated from the body following masturbation.  It is not taken from the body.  It’s already left.  Eggs, however, are removed from the body in an invasive procedure much as other tissue might be taken from a body.

I am seeking confirmation from you that Ministerial approval for advertising by IVF clinics for sperm donors is not required.

Yours faithfully                                                         

Stephen Page                                                            

Harrington Family Lawyers                                   
Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Is the West Australian Surrogacy Act Unconstitutional?

The West Australian Surrogacy Act is at the centre of a constitutional challenge that could transform who may lawfully pursue surrogacy in Western Australia. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court on 18 November 2025, and judgment was expected within six weeks. At stake is whether state surrogacy rules that exclude single men, gay… Read More »Is the West Australian Surrogacy Act Unconstitutional?

Mexico Surrogacy Law Update: Good News for Intended Parents!

A July 2024 decision of the Supreme Court of Mexico, arising from Jalisco, marks a significant development for international surrogacy. The court has clarified the legal framework for obtaining an amparo order in surrogacy cases and set out mandatory protections for surrogates. These changes bring greater certainty for intended parents while emphasising the rights and… Read More »Mexico Surrogacy Law Update: Good News for Intended Parents!

Brisbane to Host the International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) Congress in 2027

The International Federation of Fertility Societies has chosen Brisbane as the host city for its next World Congress in April 2027. This decision marks a major milestone for Australia and New Zealand’s fertility sector, bringing together clinicians, researchers, allied health professionals and legal experts from across the globe to share knowledge, debate policy and present… Read More »Brisbane to Host the International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) Congress in 2027

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board