Case: USA Unlawful Dismissal because worker sacked due to domestic violence complaint

Case: USA Unlawful Dismissal because worker sacked due to domestic violence complaint

A recent US case,Steel v Snowline Industries, from Oregon, is a useful illustration of how domestic violence matters can impact at work.

Allison Steel sought and was granted a civil protection order against an abusive co-worker, which prevented him from coming to work. Soon after, she was fired by their employer Snowline Manufacturing Oregon.

Allison Steel took Snowline to court alleging unlawful dismissal. She was successful, obtaining a payout of $27,500, part of which was under the common law. In addition to any statutory rights, workers in Australia may have rights under common law.

The jury, apparently for the first time,found that the employer had breached an Oregon statute which prohibits retaliation for initiating or testifying in a civil proceeding or for filing a criminal complaint, and applied it to a domestic violence victim’s application for or seeking enforcement of a restraining order or reporting an abuser’s criminal activity.

In Australia if the employer’s behaviours were to be repeated, aside from the possibility of the payout, the employer and its various responsible managers/directors may have committed criminal offences. For example, the Criminal Code Queensland provides:

A person who, without reasonable cause, causes, or threatens
to cause, any injury or detriment to a …………witness…..or a
member of the family of a ….. witness ….. in retaliation because
of—…
(b) anything lawfully done by the …..witness in any
judicial proceeding; is guilty of a crime.
Maximum penalty—7 years imprisonment.

If as an employer you sack (or even threaten to sack) an employee because they are making complaint to police about a fellow employee who is alleged to be committing domestic violence against the first employee, you may be looking at jail time.

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

How to Obtain a NSW Parentage Order for a Child Born Overseas

Starting July 1, 2025, groundbreaking changes to New South Wales law will significantly affect families involved in overseas surrogacy arrangements. These changes empower the NSW Supreme Court to issue parentage orders for children born through commercial surrogacy overseas—a legal pathway previously unavailable.

Monash IVF Mixup Prompts Health Ministers Rapid Review of IVF Regulation

In recent months, Australia’s fertility sector has been shaken by two unprecedented embryo mixups at Monash IVF clinics. These incidents have not only caused distress and confusion for affected families but have also exposed critical weaknesses in the country’s IVF regulatory framework.

Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) Human Tissue Review

Explore the Australian Law Reform Commission’s review on human tissue laws and what it means for IVF, surrogacy, and reproductive medicine. Learn about key legal changes and their implications for families and practitioners.

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board