Same-sex changes to take effect 15 March

Same-sex changes to take effect 15 March

The Governor-General has proclaimed that the Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws – General Law Reform) Act 2008 is to commence on 15 March.

Click here for the proclamation.

The changes remove discrimination from a raft of Commonwealth legislation, including:

  • Medicare
  • Tax
  • DFRDB
  • Veterans’ Affairs
  • Superannuation for Commonwealth public servants

For the full list of legislation being amended (and it’s huge!) click here.

The changes came about from the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Report in 2007 : Same-Sex: Same Entitlements, which identified 55 Commonwealth laws which discriminated against same-sex people in their property and personal rights. The Howard Government refused to make the changes (except promising to change superannuation matters concerning Commonwealth public servants).

Kevin Rudd promised to make the changes. On coming to office his government identified that there were 100 laws that discriminated.

84 of those laws will be altered on 15 March.

Some of the changes will not be put into place until 1 July. Same sex partners have been able to take advantage of the Social Security Act because their relationship has not been recognised as a “marriage like relationship”. Therefore, what their partner has earned has been irrelevant.

The Government has previously announced that, with the changes, it is expected by 1 July that same sex couples in which one or both receive Centrelink will be subject to the same rules as straight couples. Some who have been able to take advantage of the rules, will then miss out, or have their benefits reduced.

Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

NSW surrogacy law is not extra-territorial: judge

It is depressing to read a judgment and realise that a judge has got something fairly basic wrong. It is even more depressing, as a family lawyer of 38 years post-admission, to see a judgment where the judge got two significant issues of law wrong in the judgment. Sadly, that occurred in the case of… Read More »NSW surrogacy law is not extra-territorial: judge

Queensland couple referred to police for surrogacy

A Queensland husband and wife, in the recent case of  Lloyd & Compton [2025] FedCFamC1A 28,  who had undertaken surrogacy in North Cyprus, were denied their chance of parenting orders and leave to adopt because they had undertaken commercial surrogacy. Instead, they were referred to the Queensland Director of Public Prosecutions for engaging in commercial… Read More »Queensland couple referred to police for surrogacy

The Disclosure Requirements in Family Law

In this video, solicitor Ella Leitch outlines the disclosure obligations every separating person must understand. For anyone engaging with family lawyers, the message is clear: transparency is essential. Failure to disclose relevant documents can lead to severe procedural and even criminal consequences, derail property settlements, and damage parenting matters. This article summarises the key legal… Read More »The Disclosure Requirements in Family Law

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board