Changes to Victorian IVF laws

Changes to Victorian IVF laws

There have been changes to the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 (Vic) which commenced on 24 June 2022:

  • Enabling individuals such as nurses within a registered ART provider to undertake artificial insemination under the supervision and direction of a doctor within that provider.
  • This amendment improves access to artificial insemination by permitting nurses and other relevant health professionals under supervision and direction, to perform this treatment.
  • The Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 already refers to the terms ‘supervision’ and ‘direction’ which are not defined. The nature of supervision and direction is determined by the relevant ART providers according to accepted clinical considerations, and relevant frameworks and policies.
  • Those who have obligations under divisions 2, 3 and 4 of the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 relating to artificial insemination treatments, including with respect to consent, counselling and advice, are still required to meet those obligations. For example:
    • Doctors continue to be responsible for determining that the woman has met the prerequisites for treatment in accordance with section 10, including that the woman and her partner have consented to treatment in the prescribed form and that the consent is current.
    • Other requirements that must be complied with include the woman and her partner undergoing pre-treatment mandated counselling, donors consenting to their donation in the prescribed form and receiving pre-donation mandated counselling, donors providing prescribed information and being advised of their rights and certain matters regarding the donor registers, and record keeping.
  • Where a nurse or other health professional carries out artificial insemination under the supervision and direction of a doctor, that nurse or other health professional is responsible for satisfying themselves that the requirements of divisions 2, 3 and 4 of the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 have been met.
  • Expanding the circumstances where a deceased person’s gametes or an embryo formed from those gametes can be used in a surrogacy arrangement with the written consent of the deceased:
    • This now includes circumstances where:
      • a man wishes to use his deceased male partner’s sperm in a surrogacy arrangement
      • a woman wishes to use her deceased female partner’s eggs in a surrogacy arrangement
      • a woman wishes to use her deceased male partner’s sperm in a surrogacy arrangement
    • The change does not apply retrospectively to existing stores of a person’s gametes and embryos where they have provided written consent to posthumous use prior to the commencement of the change.
    • From the commencement of the change, a person could provide a new written consent in relation to existing stores of that person’s gametes and embryos to allow for posthumous use in the expanded circumstances.
  • Amending language in the ‘Guiding Principles’ of the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 and making the Guiding Principles more inclusive. These changes:
  • Replace the term ‘men and women’ with ‘individuals’, replace the term ‘genetic parents’ with ‘donors’ and replace the term ‘marital status’ with ‘marital or relationship status, gender identity, sex characteristics’.
Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Should You Go to Columbia for Surrogacy?

In this video, I explain why Australians should pause before pursuing surrogacy in Colombia. As an experienced family and fertility lawyer, I want to be upfront: this is complex territory. If you are considering international surrogacy, you need to involve an expert surrogacy lawyer early — not as an afterthought. I walk through the legal landscape… Read More »Should You Go to Columbia for Surrogacy?

Surrogacy in Mexico: Important Update

In this video, I explained why Mexico has become a more attractive option for some intended parents than the United States — and why that does not mean the journey is easy or without serious legal pitfalls. As someone who has lived infertility, worked on more than 2,000 surrogacy journeys across 39 countries, and advised Australian… Read More »Surrogacy in Mexico: Important Update

Meta’s Surrogacy Policy Dilemma: Lessons from Facebook’s Review

A few years ago, Sarah Wynn-Williams interviewed me, as Facebook was looking at what position it should take about commercial #surrogacy. Facebook was concerned about the possibility of exploitation. Two great difficulties I pointed out were: What is commercial #surrogacy? There was no clear definition, and many shades of grey, making it difficult to characterise… Read More »Meta’s Surrogacy Policy Dilemma: Lessons from Facebook’s Review

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board