A failure to screen for same sex domestic violence

A failure to screen for same sex domestic violence


Next week my fiancé Mitchell and I travel to the US.  I’ll be speaking at conferences, but more importantly on 8 October we are getting married in Vegas.
Yesterday I came up with the bright idea to buy him flowers, being the last time before our wedding.  Last night when he was opening the wrapping, for some reason he used a knife and not scissors and managed to stab himself in the hand.  Blood poured out.
We ended up at the local hospital, a big teaching hospital in Brisbane and particularly, a hospital that has been the centre of research about domestic violence in accident and emergency wards.  Research undertaken at that hospital some years ago demonstrated that there was inadequate screening for domestic violence, that domestic violence towards women was prevalent in emergency presentations, and there needed to be protocols in place to ensure that domestic violence was screened for consistently.
Despite all the blood, luckily there was no major damage.
What shocked me on reflection this morning, however, was that despite being interviewed by two nurses, a clerk and a doctor; and nursing what could quite easily have been an injury from domestic violence, neither Mitch nor I were interviewed about the possibility of there having been domestic violence.  It simply wasn’t asked. No domestic violence screening was undertaken at all.
I don’t know whether this would be reflective if the couple were a man and a woman.  Hopefully there would be screening for domestic violence, but what it does say to me is that there is clearly inadequate screening for same sex domestic violence amongst emergency presentations at that hospital and that despite there having been laws in Queensland since 2003 protecting against same sex domestic violence, clearly much more needs to be done.
While we had an accident, a similar injury might have been deliberate.  It should have been screened for and if detected, support offered to the victim and if necessary reported to appropriate authorities and community agencies for help.
Request an Appointment
Fill in the form below to find out if you have a claim.
Request an Appointment - Stephen Page
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Surrogacy lawyer explains upcoming ALRC reports

Australia is approaching an important moment for family and fertility law. By the end of July 2026 and during August 2026, the Australian Law Reform Commission, or ALRC, is expected to deliver two major reports to Commonwealth Attorney General Michelle Rowland. One report will address surrogacy law. The other will examine Australia’s human tissue laws.… Read More »Surrogacy lawyer explains upcoming ALRC reports

Overseas surrogacy births now recognised in Australia

For years, the recognition of parents through overseas surrogacy has been unnecessarily uncertain. Australian intended parents could return home with a child, a foreign birth certificate and a foreign court order, yet still face questions about whether Australian law recognised them as parents. That position changed on 1 April 2025. It may be April Fool’s… Read More »Overseas surrogacy births now recognised in Australia

Do children have a say in parenting cases? Lawyer explains

In Australian parenting cases, children can have a say. That much is clear. But the more accurate answer is that yes, children’s views matter, but the weight given to those views depends on the individual child and the circumstances of the case. That is often where confusion starts. Many parents assume a child can simply… Read More »Do children have a say in parenting cases? Lawyer explains

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board