Federal Magistrate Court case – cutting the deal is by BFA or order only

Federal Magistrate Court case – cutting the deal is by BFA or order only

A recent Federal Magistrates Court case, Resch and Resch, is a good illustration of how, aside from death, there are only two ways to finally conclude a deal about property settlement under the Family Law Act: a binding financial agreement or consent orders.

The husband and wife attended mediation and reached agreement as to the terms of a binding financial agreement and consent orders. The wife had a change of mind and did not sign the documents. The husband sought to enforce the oral agreement.

Not surprisingly, the husband was unsuccessful, and costs were ordered against him.

[Disclosure- on reading the judgment, I realised that I am the former solicitor for the wife.]

Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Pets and Australian Family Law: Changes Coming in June 2025

Soon when couples separate, it will be easier for courts to make orders about pets, so that there is clarity about who has Chase the dog, Harry the cat, or Goldie the goldfish. Australian Courts have always had the ability to make orders concerning pets or animals. For instance, in the 1980s, I acted in… Read More »Pets and Australian Family Law: Changes Coming in June 2025

What Really Happens to Your Assets During Divorce?

Divorce is tough, and figuring out what happens to your assets can be even tougher. But don’t worry—Bruce Provan, Managing Director of Page Provan Family & Fertility Lawyers, is here to break it all down for you!

The Job that Surrogacy Lawyers Hate Doing

In this video, Stephen Page shares his insights from my decades-long journey through surrogacy. From advising nearly 2,000 surrogacy journeys across Australia and 38 countries, he’s seen it all!

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board