Qld: Proposals for same-sex parenting reform

Qld: Proposals for same-sex parenting reform

The issues paper released yesterday in Queensland, and open for comment until 18 September, about same sex parenting issues proposes a number of changes:

  • The gender specific wording of the presumptions in the Status of Children Act treats children of lesbian couples differently from children of heterosexual de facto couples.
    Unlike children of heterosexual couples, children conceived from a fertilisation
    procedure or artificial insemination and born into a same-sex relationship have only
    one legal parent (the birth mother), although the intention of the couple is to co-parent
    the child. A child born into this situation may be disadvantaged throughout life and on
    the death of their parents by having a legal connection to only one parent and one set
    of extended family.
  • To achieve consistency with other jurisdictions and in line with the other
    jurisdictions’ reviews, amendments to the Status of Children Act 1978 to extend the
    current presumptions are required. Amendments to the Births, Deaths and Marriages
    Registration Act 2003 enabling the birth mother’s partner to be recorded as a parent of
    the child are also required.
  • In the ACT, the presumptions of parentage have been extended to include same-sex
    couples who cohabit or where a fertilisation procedure has been used to conceive a
    child. The amendments replace the gender specific wording in the relevant sections
    with references to ‘parent’ and ‘spouse’ as defined in the Acts Interpretation Act
  • In Victoria, New South Wales, Western Australian, Northern Territory and the
    Commonwealth (under the Family Law Act 1975), the amendments to the
    presumptions have been limited to where there has been a fertilisation procedure used
    to conceive the child. The amendments insert a new provision to recognise the nonbiological lesbian co-parent, where the birth mother has undergone the fertilisation
    procedure with the consent of her partner.
  • The effect of the operation of these presumptions is that when the child’s birth is
    registered, the non-biological lesbian co-parent is eligible to be registered as ‘parent’
    alongside the birth mother’s registration as ‘mother’. The birth certificate issued
    subsequent to this registration similarly identifies the ‘mother’ and ‘parent’.
    Either approach will remove the situation whereby male partners of women who
    become pregnant are presumed to be the parent of the child, but female partners are
    not, as a result of part 3 of the Status of Children Act 1978,.
  • The presumptions in the Status of Children Act 1978 are presumptions as to legal
    parentage, not genetic parentage, and any such amendments would be consistent both
    with the current framework and objectives of the Act to provide for legal certainty for
    children. Also the amendments will not detract from the uniformity sought in relation
    to the presumptions of paternity in circumstances of cohabitation or artificial
    conception. The amendments will not affect the parental responsibilities of fathers in
    circumstances where an opposite sex couple separate after having children and the
    woman commences a later relationship with another woman.
  • Queensland reform in this area will adopt the approach of the majority of Australian
    jurisdictions who have opted for the insertion of a specific provision relating to where
    artificial insemination and IVF have been used to conceive the child. This proposal
    will provide legal recognition of the parental status of a non-biological parent who has
    planned with her partner to have and raise a child together as a family. The legal
    recognition of the family structures of children born into same sex relationships will:
    ? provide these children with two legal parents instead of only one;
    ? promote certainty for parents and children in terms of the legal relationships
    with each other;
    ? provide legal certainty for service providers when they act on the basis of the
    consent of the non-biological parent; and
    ? provide children with the same level of security, both personal and financial, as
    children of heterosexual parents, should either of their parents die.
  • This proposal would not affect children of male same-sex couples as the presumptions
    are based on the relationship with the woman who gives birth to the child. However,
    male same-sex couples may be eligible to apply for a transfer of legal parentage from
    the birth mother under the proposed Queensland surrogacy model provided that there
    is compliance with the prescribed requirements under the model, such as a preconception
    arrangement with no commercial benefits to any party.
  • This proposal also does not affect the legal relationship between a child and the same
    sex partner of a biological parent where the relationship was formed after the birth of
    the child. However, these relationships are more analogous to heterosexual stepparenting
    and are able to be legally secured through Family Court parenting orders.
Things to Read, Watch & Listen

Proposed Assisted Reproductive Treatment Changes in Victoria

In this video Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer, Stephen Page, talks about the proposed ART changes in Victoria.

Surrogacy in Canada or Australia? Which is the Best?

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page breaks down the surrogacy process in Australia versus Canada.

Landmark International Surrogacy Court Decisions

In this video, Page Provan Director and award-winning surrogacy lawyer Stephen Page explores international landmark court decisions for surrogacy.

Family Law Section Law Council of Australia Award
Member of Queensland law society
Family law Practitioners Association
International Academy of Family Lawyers - IAFL
Mediator Standards Board